Google Maps has now switched their map data provision completely over to TeleAtlas from Navteq. Now the google Maps, the Google API and the Google Maps for Mobile all use the same underlying data. This switch was only a matter of time given Nokia aquisition of Navteq. Here is the announcement from Google’s Maps Guide Adam:
Hi Everyone,
I wanted to give you a heads up that Google Maps recently made some changes to the map data. Specifically, we have moved Google Maps over to use the same map data from Tele Atlas that is currently used by both the Google Maps API and Google Maps for Mobile. While most of the map will look the same, and in many areas it will improve, there may also be some cases where the data may not be optimal. In those cases, we encourage you to use one of the following options to helpimprove our maps:
-Community Edits
If you notice an error, feel free to correct it yourself by clicking on the “Edit” link in the information bubble that appears for alocation. For more information, check out this Maps Help Center page:
http://maps.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=68474#modify
-Report the error directly to TeleAtlas
You can notify our map provider directly using the following link:
http://www.teleatlas.com/ForConsumers/MapFeedback/index.htm
And as always, to view a one-stop-shop for reporting all types of Map errors, please visit http://maps.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=98014Maps Guide Adam


I wonder if that means changing centroids? The centroids for Yahoo and Google are different for different cities. AFAIK, there is no fixed centroid for a municipal location by definition.
That could shake up maps rankings, and in some cases, considerably.
Comment by Dave Oremland (12 comments) — September 19, 2008 @ 3:35 pm
Great question! Not sure I know and it will be interesting to see.
In reading a Maps patent it strikes me that the list of zipcodes that Google includes in a given geo phrase like washington has more to do with the centroid calculation…so the question is if those zip codes come from Google or from their Map provider.
Also given Google’s lower reliance on distance as opposed to Location Prominence Score it might not have that much impact.
Mike
Comment by Mike Blumenthal (794 comments) — September 19, 2008 @ 3:47 pm
The location returned when you ask for a city in the USA or Canada with maps.google.com is now exactly the same as the location that you get with Google Maps API. That wasn’t the case before the provider switch.
Also the route returned by “get directions” is now the same as that which was previously returned by the API.
It would make sense for all the geographical information to have been switched, so yes, a search for [business] near [city] would start searching from the TeleAtlas location for that city.
Comment by Mike Williams (1 comments) — September 19, 2008 @ 8:39 pm
Hi Mike
Thanks for the insight. It will be of interest to see how this affects ranking> I am not sure though that there is good pre and post data to compare against but if any body has any example I would love to hear about them.
Mike
Comment by Mike Blumenthal (794 comments) — September 19, 2008 @ 8:50 pm
It doesn’t really seem to matter which map provider google use, they still can’t plot a decent route through London, UK.
try this one to see what I mean.
Grange Road, SE1 to Stamford Street, SE1.
now try the same route using google’s walk option; this is the route that should also be doen by car. but instead this useless routing software goes around in a huge arc around the direct route.
Comment by eric (4 comments) — September 21, 2008 @ 6:17 pm
Hi eric
Yea if the underlying data is bad or missing, Google’s route is going to not be worth anything.
One hopes that over time and with more user dmands and inputs this data will improve and thus so will Map’s ability to provided meaningful instructions.
Is there a mapping service in London doing a better job?
Mike
Comment by Mike (1282 comments) — September 21, 2008 @ 8:56 pm
[...] switched to using TeleAtlas in a mid September timeframe. The reports of serious underlying map data [...]
Pingback by Understanding Google Maps & Yahoo Local Search » How long does it take to fix an map data error? | Developing Knowledge about Local Search — October 28, 2008 @ 11:23 am
[...] nouvelle est tombée en fin de semaine via le blog de Mike Blumenthal : Navteq ne fait plus parti des fournisseurs cartographiques de Google. Désormais, TeleAtlas [...]
Pingback by Google choisit TeleAtlas, et seulement TeleAtlas — November 11, 2008 @ 11:55 am
[...] Maps: Will Edit Wars go Politically Postal?Google choisit TeleAtlas, et seulement TeleAtlas on Google Maps now using TeleAtlas data exclusivelyEt pendant ce temps là…. on The time for a “Geo” Sitemap is [...]
Pingback by Understanding Google Maps & Yahoo Local Search » Google Maps + TeleAtlas + TomTom = Powerful map update strategy | Developing Knowledge about Local Search — November 13, 2008 @ 10:29 am
I just downloaded the mobile application of google maps onto my blackberry – nice! Can you easily re-route as you can on the website version of google maps by clicking and dragging the current route to the desired location?
Thanks in advance for you tips!
Comment by glen (1 comments) — November 16, 2008 @ 8:39 pm
[...] aligned themselves exclusively with TomTom/TeleAtlas as their provider of map data. This appears to have been both a strategic and [...]
Pingback by TomTom rolls out new mapping product, announces 5 millionth user edit » Understanding Google Maps & Yahoo Local Search — December 22, 2008 @ 7:31 am
[...] topics afterwards about possible improvements to Google maps because of this deal apply as well. http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/09/19/google-maps-now-using-teleatlas-data-exclusively/ [...]
Pingback by Loci 2008 - Martijn Beijk’s The year in Local Search 2008 » Understanding Google Maps & Yahoo Local Search — January 12, 2009 @ 6:01 am
[...] is a good blog article about Google decision to move to [...]
Pingback by TeleAtlas vs NavTeq — March 4, 2009 @ 12:41 am
[...] was only last year that Tele Atlas and Google signed a long term deal for Tele Atlas to replace Navteq as Google’s sole third party road data provider. In January of this year, after the [...]
Pingback by Google Replaces Tele Atlas Data in US with Google StreetView Data | Understanding Google Maps & Local Search — October 12, 2009 @ 4:02 am
[...] change, which was fixed at one time during the pre TeleAtlas times, seems to have reverted to bad data as a result of the recent Google Maps switch from use of [...]
Pingback by Google Maps: Will We Ever See Sunrise? | Understanding Google Maps & Local Search — October 19, 2009 @ 9:21 am
[...] is most likely due to the recent change away from using TeleAtlas mapping data. It is possible that it was also occurring using the old geodata but relatively unsophisticated [...]
Pingback by Google Maps Update: See your Listing in Maps (Or not) | Understanding Google Maps & Local Search — October 29, 2009 @ 12:00 pm