{"id":8342,"date":"2010-12-06T05:00:11","date_gmt":"2010-12-06T09:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/?p=8342"},"modified":"2010-12-04T15:47:43","modified_gmt":"2010-12-04T19:47:43","slug":"google-places-search-before-and-after-dashboard-analytics-comparison","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/2010\/12\/06\/google-places-search-before-and-after-dashboard-analytics-comparison\/","title":{"rendered":"Google Places Search &#8211; Before and After Dashboard Analytics Comparison"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/business-with-postivie-action-change1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-8417\" title=\"business-with-postivie-action-change1\" src=\"http:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/business-with-postivie-action-change1-289x200.jpg\" alt=\"specific listing changes in actions for those business showing increases\" width=\"289\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/business-with-postivie-action-change1-289x200.jpg 289w, https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/business-with-postivie-action-change1-520x358.jpg 520w, https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/business-with-postivie-action-change1.jpg 710w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 289px) 100vw, 289px\" \/><\/a>Google Places search was released on October 27 with a great deal of fanfare and <a href=\"http:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/2010\/10\/27\/what-are-the-implications-of-the-new-integrated-local-search-results\/\">commentary<\/a>. It has been available for over a month and the Places Dashboard analytics data can now provide some insight into the impact of the new display.<\/p>\n<p>I have assembled an overview of the impressions and actions based of the Dashboard analytics for 45 listings for the 4 weeks prior to the rollout and the 4 weeks after the rollout.<\/p>\n<p>I recognize that these numbers are, by design, superficial and are on occasion buggy (showing fewer impressions than actions). We also don&#8217;t know if the analytics kept up with the main search results page.  However in aggregate, they do provide some general insights about the switch. The business listings represent a range of industries, locales and business size so the sample should represent a reasonable cross section of reality.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 520px; height: 450px;\" border=\"1\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Overall<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\">Change in Aggregate Actions<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">Up 28%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\">Change in Aggregate Impressions<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\">Down 25%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\"><strong>Action Impression Ration<\/strong><\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\">Action\/Impression Ratio Before<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\">7.17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\">Action\/Impression Ratio After<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\">12.26%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\"><strong>Businesses with Increases<\/strong><\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\">Number of Listings with Increased Actions<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\">20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\">Average % increase in Actions for Businesses<br \/>\nwith Increases<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\">328%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\">Average % increase in Impressions for Businesses<br \/>\nwith Increases<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\">7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\"><strong>Businesses with Decreases<\/strong><\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\">Number of Listings with Decreased Actions<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\">22<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\">Average % decrease in Actions Business<br \/>\nwith Decreases<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\">-55%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\">Average % decrease in Impressions for Businesses<br \/>\nwith Decreases<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\">-23%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\"><\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td align=\"left\" valign=\"TOP\">Number of Listing with No Change in Actions<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\" valign=\"TOP\">3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Discussion<\/p>\n<p>The number of listings with increases is roughly equal to those with decreased actions although the average increase was significantly higher than the average loss. I have not done a granular enough analysis to fulling understand but it appears that strong (ie better ranking websites) got stronger and the weak lost visibility.<\/p>\n<p>In one particular case, it is obvious that a business in the burbs that was doing well organically  but not locally on the major city searches has been rewarded with a blended placement on the major geo phrase. The bears further study but gave me the distinct impression  that the geo area that defines a given search has in some cases been expanded and that businesses that were previously outside of that range now have a shot at first page blended placement.<\/p>\n<p>It is interesting that the actions increased while the impressions were down. The average of actions to impressions increased from 7.17% to 12.26%. This would imply that the UI changes with Places search significantly increases Places related actions (directions, website clicks, more info clicks) and is more efficient at leading to actions that Google wants. This makes sense in that previously some local search traffic was &#8220;lost&#8221; to organic results. These results obviously reflect the new blended reality.<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/businesses-with-neg-action-change.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-thumbnail wp-image-8421 alignright\" title=\"businesses-with-neg-action-change\" src=\"http:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/businesses-with-neg-action-change-296x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"296\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/businesses-with-neg-action-change-296x200.jpg 296w, https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/businesses-with-neg-action-change-520x350.jpg 520w, https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/businesses-with-neg-action-change.jpg 685w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 296px) 100vw, 296px\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nOne area that would be of use to explore would be to examine the relative changes in specific behaviors within the Actions and compare that to changes in website traffic overall. It would be interesting to know if Google or the business is capturing more of the activity.<\/p>\n<p>As in many changes, there were winners and losers. But in the end if more people are finding what they want with fewer searches then those businesses that understand the rules, the users AND Google will all benefit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Google Places search was released on October 27 with a great deal of fanfare and commentary. It has been available for over a month and the Places Dashboard analytics data can now provide some insight into the impact of the new display. I have assembled an overview of the impressions and actions based of the &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":262,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8342","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-google-maps-google-local"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8342","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8342"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8342\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8425,"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8342\/revisions\/8425"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8342"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8342"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8342"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}