{"id":105,"date":"2007-02-14T09:55:58","date_gmt":"2007-02-14T13:55:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/?p=105"},"modified":"2007-02-14T14:07:25","modified_gmt":"2007-02-14T18:07:25","slug":"one-small-step-for-google-a-smaller-step-for-mankind","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/2007\/02\/14\/one-small-step-for-google-a-smaller-step-for-mankind\/","title":{"rendered":"One small step for Google, a smaller step for Mankind"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday I wrote of Google now allowing user <a href=\"http:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/?p=104\">correction of unverified business listings <\/a>in Google Maps.  It was reported by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.seroundtable.com\/archives\/012370.html\">Barry Schwartz<\/a> and repeated elsewhere that I, in part, played a part in this outcome. Well it has been a sort of Charlie Brown moment&#8230;. You know, when Lucy holds out the football every fall and Charlie, in his trusting way, goes to kick it&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>After further looking and some user reports, it turns out that this feature is much less widespread than I previously thought.<\/p>\n<p>I assumed that &#8220;unverified&#8221;  meant any record that had not been claimed by the owner or one of Google&#8217;s partners (like Superpages or Talking Phone Book); a record that had no &#8220;details&#8221; yet associated with it. Google&#8217;s actual definition is clearly much more narrow than that.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, while I can <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/maps?hl=en&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial&#038;hs=1Wd&#038;q=foundation&#038;near=Olean,+NY+14760&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=local&#038;ct=title\">replicate the results<\/a> (so it wasn&#8217;t a temporary test on Google&#8217;s part) on a single search, I have only been able to find very few &#8220;unverified&#8221; records in any other industries or locations amongst the many that I have tried.<br \/>\nThe issue of accuracy in local data is  an important one (see Greg Sterling&#8217;s recent post:<a title=\"Permanent Link to Data Quality: The Local Achilles Heel\" rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/gesterling.wordpress.com\/2007\/02\/13\/data-quality-the-local-achilles-heel\/\"> Data Quality: The Local Achilles Heel<\/a>) and there is value in allowing the community to correct any errors. In fact as a tactic, the easier it is to correct an erroneous local record, the less Google will be criticized for (even obvious) errors in the data and the way they are assembled.<\/p>\n<p>However, in this case, the essence of Google&#8217;s credibility is at stake. The undisputed king of the algorithm has an algorithm that is, on the very rare occasion, <a href=\"http:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/?p=102\">assigning a competitor&#8217;s web site<\/a> to a business&#8217;s Map record. <a href=\"http:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/?p=101\">This error<\/a>, while uncommon, shatters the  perception that Google is infallible in the search arena. An error like this, creates the impression of unreliability and non-trust amongst users. Google is many users&#8217; single most trusted URL on the web and there is implicit faith in its accuracy.<\/p>\n<p>The problem, while not widespread, is serious and allowing users to correct the problem could be  a step forward. Allowing correction of the few &#8220;unverified&#8221; records (please report if you find more) that I have stumbled upon out of the twenty five million U.S. business records extant is not an adequate solution.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps, the example that I have found, is but a first step in allowing community input. Perhaps an algorithm that fixes the problem is just around the corner. Perhaps I won&#8217;t have to feel like Charlie Brown after all.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday I wrote of Google now allowing user correction of unverified business listings in Google Maps. It was reported by Barry Schwartz and repeated elsewhere that I, in part, played a part in this outcome. Well it has been a sort of Charlie Brown moment&#8230;. You know, when Lucy holds out the football every fall &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":262,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-google-maps-google-local"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=105"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blumenthals.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}