<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: G+ Local URLs MIA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/09/21/g-local-urls-mia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/09/21/g-local-urls-mia/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:15:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Mumford</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/09/21/g-local-urls-mia/comment-page-1/#comment-581532</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Mumford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 02:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=13513#comment-581532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe it helps Google to get clicks to the actual profile page, instead of the website, where it doesn&#039;t have adds]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it helps Google to get clicks to the actual profile page, instead of the website, where it doesn&#8217;t have adds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Buck</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/09/21/g-local-urls-mia/comment-page-1/#comment-581503</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=13513#comment-581503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike, today I was able to go in and &quot;add&quot; information to one of the affected properties via the Plus Local page and was able to get the URL restored. I&#039;ll be writing a blog post about this today. It appears that Google is disallowing edits made to Plus Local pages - so that the information (i.e. url/phone #) is not listed. In this case, I just logged into Google, accessed the local plus page via the listings and added the info, which then was accepted and is now showing in Places listings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, today I was able to go in and &#8220;add&#8221; information to one of the affected properties via the Plus Local page and was able to get the URL restored. I&#8217;ll be writing a blog post about this today. It appears that Google is disallowing edits made to Plus Local pages &#8211; so that the information (i.e. url/phone #) is not listed. In this case, I just logged into Google, accessed the local plus page via the listings and added the info, which then was accepted and is now showing in Places listings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Forster</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/09/21/g-local-urls-mia/comment-page-1/#comment-581284</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Forster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 19:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=13513#comment-581284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Mike,

We finally got our Google Local PIN in the mail, and did the merge. I&#039;ve noticed the same results here in Canada where it&#039;s listing the Google Plus Business page not the &#039;local/places&#039; result.

Hopefully this gets sorted out Soon.

- Andrew]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike,</p>
<p>We finally got our Google Local PIN in the mail, and did the merge. I&#8217;ve noticed the same results here in Canada where it&#8217;s listing the Google Plus Business page not the &#8216;local/places&#8217; result.</p>
<p>Hopefully this gets sorted out Soon.</p>
<p>- Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
