<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The PlusBox: Old UI Feature is New Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/02/22/the-plusbox-old-ui-feature-is-new-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/02/22/the-plusbox-old-ui-feature-is-new-again/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:55:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Local Search Result Display &#124; Understanding Google Places &#38; Local Search</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/02/22/the-plusbox-old-ui-feature-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-577035</link>
		<dc:creator>New Local Search Result Display &#124; Understanding Google Places &#38; Local Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=12279#comment-577035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that Joy is showing of the before and after, what I think we are seeing is a new more obvious Plus Box display. These typically will use reliable web based address information but it need not be rich snippet in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Joy is showing of the before and after, what I think we are seeing is a new more obvious Plus Box display. These typically will use reliable web based address information but it need not be rich snippet in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Venice Shift from Local Pack to Blended Results &#124; Understanding Google Places &#38; Local Search</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/02/22/the-plusbox-old-ui-feature-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-569587</link>
		<dc:creator>The Venice Shift from Local Pack to Blended Results &#124; Understanding Google Places &#38; Local Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=12279#comment-569587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that started in late January had significant impact on Google local search results. We saw an increase in the display of the PlusBox, an increased search display of Blended results, reduced display of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that started in late January had significant impact on Google local search results. We saw an increase in the display of the PlusBox, an increased search display of Blended results, reduced display of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/02/22/the-plusbox-old-ui-feature-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-567775</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=12279#comment-567775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en&amp;q=Kazak+Media+%22197+Horn+Ave%22&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;197 Horn&lt;/a&gt; is the wrong address then Google has it from a lot of sources.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If <a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en&amp;q=Kazak+Media+%22197+Horn+Ave%22&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8">197 Horn</a> is the wrong address then Google has it from a lot of sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Kazak</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/02/22/the-plusbox-old-ui-feature-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-567774</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Kazak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=12279#comment-567774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mike

I have the plusbox on my company&#039;s website search engine result. The address isn&#039;t listed one any page within my website, but it is listed in Google Places and other directories. The address they are displaying isn&#039;t correct, we have moved since. Maybe this will be a good test to see what I need to change for it to reflect properly on the website.

Kyle]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike</p>
<p>I have the plusbox on my company&#8217;s website search engine result. The address isn&#8217;t listed one any page within my website, but it is listed in Google Places and other directories. The address they are displaying isn&#8217;t correct, we have moved since. Maybe this will be a good test to see what I need to change for it to reflect properly on the website.</p>
<p>Kyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Law</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/02/22/the-plusbox-old-ui-feature-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-567755</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=12279#comment-567755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve just encountered this + box for the first time today when I noticed a competing website had said + box and I was pretty irked by it. I think as someone said earlier from a users point of view it&#039;s very useful.

The places &lt;i&gt;merry go round&lt;/i&gt; is getting pretty irksome with change being the only constant as you say. I have spent a lot of effort and time attempting to get Google to notice my locations, but what happens if you have more than one location.

The site I am attempting to rank in the Google Places results has three locations and so three different geo tagging locations. Will this confuse poor Google? am I better offer going for one location on the main site to one Place page. Then associating the other Places pages to locations on satellite sites or something.

The problem then is for the poor old site visitors who want to find each location, which, by the way are very close to each other - within two miles or less.

Any suggestions gratefully recieved

Jon]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just encountered this + box for the first time today when I noticed a competing website had said + box and I was pretty irked by it. I think as someone said earlier from a users point of view it&#8217;s very useful.</p>
<p>The places <i>merry go round</i> is getting pretty irksome with change being the only constant as you say. I have spent a lot of effort and time attempting to get Google to notice my locations, but what happens if you have more than one location.</p>
<p>The site I am attempting to rank in the Google Places results has three locations and so three different geo tagging locations. Will this confuse poor Google? am I better offer going for one location on the main site to one Place page. Then associating the other Places pages to locations on satellite sites or something.</p>
<p>The problem then is for the poor old site visitors who want to find each location, which, by the way are very close to each other &#8211; within two miles or less.</p>
<p>Any suggestions gratefully recieved</p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/02/22/the-plusbox-old-ui-feature-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-567707</link>
		<dc:creator>earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=12279#comment-567707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike:

+ boxes are a stroll down memory lane in conjunction with problems at Google Places.  You gave an excellent review of ways to reference location within the site.  Let me add ones that adversely affected sites in the past with erroneous address information showing via + boxes.

&lt;b&gt;Clean your site of references to old addresses&lt;/b&gt;.  Specifically larger institutions, hospitals, schools, places with nearby multiple addresses, businesses or institutions that lease/buy in multiple properties within a region.   

In the past there were Google Maps/Google Places/+box errors showing for addresses when Google replaced current information with obscure older information buried on larger websites representing bigger websites  with many pages for a larger institution.     

I&#039;d go through the whole danged websites and purge any old address information.  We found some very obscure address information in the past that was crazily the source for erroneous +box addresses despite more obvious clear signals.

+Boxes that is a trip down Places Purgatory:  :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:</p>
<p>+ boxes are a stroll down memory lane in conjunction with problems at Google Places.  You gave an excellent review of ways to reference location within the site.  Let me add ones that adversely affected sites in the past with erroneous address information showing via + boxes.</p>
<p><b>Clean your site of references to old addresses</b>.  Specifically larger institutions, hospitals, schools, places with nearby multiple addresses, businesses or institutions that lease/buy in multiple properties within a region.   </p>
<p>In the past there were Google Maps/Google Places/+box errors showing for addresses when Google replaced current information with obscure older information buried on larger websites representing bigger websites  with many pages for a larger institution.     </p>
<p>I&#8217;d go through the whole danged websites and purge any old address information.  We found some very obscure address information in the past that was crazily the source for erroneous +box addresses despite more obvious clear signals.</p>
<p>+Boxes that is a trip down Places Purgatory:  <img src='http://blumenthals.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/02/22/the-plusbox-old-ui-feature-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-567659</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=12279#comment-567659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mark
Yes I too really like the UI but.....

1)It has always been a crap shoot whether it shows and how to get it... needs to be more transparent

2)It isn&#039;t clear how it performs next to pinned results. 

3)Do we need one more UI convention? Christ, google, pick one, make it simple and stick with it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark<br />
Yes I too really like the UI but&#8230;..</p>
<p>1)It has always been a crap shoot whether it shows and how to get it&#8230; needs to be more transparent</p>
<p>2)It isn&#8217;t clear how it performs next to pinned results. </p>
<p>3)Do we need one more UI convention? Christ, google, pick one, make it simple and stick with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/02/22/the-plusbox-old-ui-feature-is-new-again/comment-page-1/#comment-567658</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=12279#comment-567658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I for one have always been a fan of the plus box with the address. I find from a user standpoint that it works well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one have always been a fan of the plus box with the address. I find from a user standpoint that it works well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
