<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Places: More UGC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/11/08/google-places-more-ugc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/11/08/google-places-more-ugc/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:58:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/11/08/google-places-more-ugc/comment-page-1/#comment-559215</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=11632#comment-559215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Keith
The devil as it were, is in the implementation &amp; use of the data not the solicitation of it. One can only hope that it is done judiciously.

@Earl
In both the above cases, it was a situation that Google didn&#039;t have the information or wasn&#039;t sure about it. How many responses it takes for them to integrate the information is unclear.

They did say that this was a test so perhaps they are measuring quality achieved and whether or not to implement the new content. As you noted, who knows.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Keith<br />
The devil as it were, is in the implementation &#038; use of the data not the solicitation of it. One can only hope that it is done judiciously.</p>
<p>@Earl<br />
In both the above cases, it was a situation that Google didn&#8217;t have the information or wasn&#8217;t sure about it. How many responses it takes for them to integrate the information is unclear.</p>
<p>They did say that this was a test so perhaps they are measuring quality achieved and whether or not to implement the new content. As you noted, who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/11/08/google-places-more-ugc/comment-page-1/#comment-559213</link>
		<dc:creator>earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=11632#comment-559213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most specifically I&#039;ve been seeing the automated questions appearing when there is a mistake or missing info.  

Seems appropriate as an automated step.  I wonder if google acts on this?  I wonder if the automated questions are a test?  

In the cases where I responded....needless to say no action.

Ah...the oftentimes great big black google hole.  Who knows what goes on there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most specifically I&#8217;ve been seeing the automated questions appearing when there is a mistake or missing info.  </p>
<p>Seems appropriate as an automated step.  I wonder if google acts on this?  I wonder if the automated questions are a test?  </p>
<p>In the cases where I responded&#8230;.needless to say no action.</p>
<p>Ah&#8230;the oftentimes great big black google hole.  Who knows what goes on there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith E. McGahey</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/11/08/google-places-more-ugc/comment-page-1/#comment-559210</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith E. McGahey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 19:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=11632#comment-559210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think some of these changes are going to open up an even bigger can of worms than previous ones.  &#039;Know the website for this place?&#039;  Why yes, it&#039;s competitors-site.com  Yikes!  It will be fun to see what sort of sh#t storm this creates.

My biggest question is, when is Google going to take a vacation on the fast and furious changes and allow some time to see how things shake out?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think some of these changes are going to open up an even bigger can of worms than previous ones.  &#8216;Know the website for this place?&#8217;  Why yes, it&#8217;s competitors-site.com  Yikes!  It will be fun to see what sort of sh#t storm this creates.</p>
<p>My biggest question is, when is Google going to take a vacation on the fast and furious changes and allow some time to see how things shake out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
