<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Hotel Finder Experiment &#8211; A Peak at the Future of Local Search as Interactive Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/08/01/google-hotel-finder-experiment-a-peak-at-the-future-of-local-search-as-interactive-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/08/01/google-hotel-finder-experiment-a-peak-at-the-future-of-local-search-as-interactive-content/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:22:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Local Adwords Ads Dominate the Hotel SERPS &#8211; The new normal?n Or a Test? &#124; Understanding Google Maps &#38; Local Search</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/08/01/google-hotel-finder-experiment-a-peak-at-the-future-of-local-search-as-interactive-content/comment-page-1/#comment-552608</link>
		<dc:creator>Local Adwords Ads Dominate the Hotel SERPS &#8211; The new normal?n Or a Test? &#124; Understanding Google Maps &#38; Local Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=10697#comment-552608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] morning I spoke of the Google Hotel experiment that made search results into interactive local content. It is not clear if this is the new normal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] morning I spoke of the Google Hotel experiment that made search results into interactive local content. It is not clear if this is the new normal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/08/01/google-hotel-finder-experiment-a-peak-at-the-future-of-local-search-as-interactive-content/comment-page-1/#comment-552603</link>
		<dc:creator>earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=10697#comment-552603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike:

What I noticed vis a vis branded searches is that the pictures from the Places page add a tremendous amount of &quot;verticalness&quot; to the information from the site.   That absolutely eats up enormous amounts of visible computer screen real estate.   Essentially above the fold on one&#039;s computer screen means that one is seeing one piece of information for one business and no other information.

Good or not?   Positive or negative?  I guess its all in the eyes of the businesses/smbs/hotels that show up in results.  If one is first its a feast!!!  An incredible bonanza.   If one is 2nd or god forbid 3rd in the SERPs its as if one is banished to limbo.

If the branded search is accurate and entirely representative of a single entity that might be fine.  If the so called branded search is one that might encompass more than one business....say because one smb/one business dominates serps for that phrase even if its not the business name than it presents a problem IMHO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:</p>
<p>What I noticed vis a vis branded searches is that the pictures from the Places page add a tremendous amount of &#8220;verticalness&#8221; to the information from the site.   That absolutely eats up enormous amounts of visible computer screen real estate.   Essentially above the fold on one&#8217;s computer screen means that one is seeing one piece of information for one business and no other information.</p>
<p>Good or not?   Positive or negative?  I guess its all in the eyes of the businesses/smbs/hotels that show up in results.  If one is first its a feast!!!  An incredible bonanza.   If one is 2nd or god forbid 3rd in the SERPs its as if one is banished to limbo.</p>
<p>If the branded search is accurate and entirely representative of a single entity that might be fine.  If the so called branded search is one that might encompass more than one business&#8230;.say because one smb/one business dominates serps for that phrase even if its not the business name than it presents a problem IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/08/01/google-hotel-finder-experiment-a-peak-at-the-future-of-local-search-as-interactive-content/comment-page-1/#comment-552601</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=10697#comment-552601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Daniel

If Google offered hotels a way to successfully disintermediate the OTA sites at a lower cost, the hotels would bend over backwards to give G any and all information any way they wanted it. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel</p>
<p>If Google offered hotels a way to successfully disintermediate the OTA sites at a lower cost, the hotels would bend over backwards to give G any and all information any way they wanted it. <img src='http://blumenthals.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/08/01/google-hotel-finder-experiment-a-peak-at-the-future-of-local-search-as-interactive-content/comment-page-1/#comment-552596</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=10697#comment-552596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mike

As hotels.com proves, there are lots of useful facets that people already use to characterize hotels, such as neighborhood (less flexible than draggable boundaries but easier to specify), accomodation type (1 star vs. 5 starts doesn&#039;t help me distinguish a B&amp;B -- which could be luxury -- from a corporate hotel), amenties (pool? jacuzzi?), etc. In general, it&#039;s hard to obtain this kind of faceted metadata for the open web. And sometimes it&#039;s hard to organize it in a fashion that is intelligible to consumers. But hotels and restaurants are ideal domains for a rich faceted search experience. By being so spartan, Google is almost reducing the hotel selection problem to price, location, and availability. I&#039;m sure that&#039;s good enough for many, but it is a lost opportunity for those who have any other selection criteria.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike</p>
<p>As hotels.com proves, there are lots of useful facets that people already use to characterize hotels, such as neighborhood (less flexible than draggable boundaries but easier to specify), accomodation type (1 star vs. 5 starts doesn&#8217;t help me distinguish a B&amp;B &#8212; which could be luxury &#8212; from a corporate hotel), amenties (pool? jacuzzi?), etc. In general, it&#8217;s hard to obtain this kind of faceted metadata for the open web. And sometimes it&#8217;s hard to organize it in a fashion that is intelligible to consumers. But hotels and restaurants are ideal domains for a rich faceted search experience. By being so spartan, Google is almost reducing the hotel selection problem to price, location, and availability. I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s good enough for many, but it is a lost opportunity for those who have any other selection criteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/08/01/google-hotel-finder-experiment-a-peak-at-the-future-of-local-search-as-interactive-content/comment-page-1/#comment-552595</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=10697#comment-552595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Daniel

1) How would you suggest that they embrace the faceted &quot;paradigm in all of its glory&quot;?

2)No it isn&#039;t hotels.com or TA... part of that though is marketing and positioning of the product... both big struggles in the past for G... think they can overcome their hesitancy in those arenas?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel</p>
<p>1) How would you suggest that they embrace the faceted &#8220;paradigm in all of its glory&#8221;?</p>
<p>2)No it isn&#8217;t hotels.com or TA&#8230; part of that though is marketing and positioning of the product&#8230; both big struggles in the past for G&#8230; think they can overcome their hesitancy in those arenas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/08/01/google-hotel-finder-experiment-a-peak-at-the-future-of-local-search-as-interactive-content/comment-page-1/#comment-552594</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=10697#comment-552594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s nice as an experiment, but it&#039;s no hotels.com. Hotels and restaurants are great domains for faceted search, and I&#039;d love to see Google embrace this paradigm in all of its glory. The draggable boundary is slick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice as an experiment, but it&#8217;s no hotels.com. Hotels and restaurants are great domains for faceted search, and I&#8217;d love to see Google embrace this paradigm in all of its glory. The draggable boundary is slick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/08/01/google-hotel-finder-experiment-a-peak-at-the-future-of-local-search-as-interactive-content/comment-page-1/#comment-552587</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=10697#comment-552587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Stuart

Thanks for the observations... I did not notice the absence of review content if not current... good catch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stuart</p>
<p>Thanks for the observations&#8230; I did not notice the absence of review content if not current&#8230; good catch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Bell</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/08/01/google-hotel-finder-experiment-a-peak-at-the-future-of-local-search-as-interactive-content/comment-page-1/#comment-552586</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=10697#comment-552586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Mike.
It&#039;s interesting there is no link to the places page (as with map results), only the website.
There are a few listings showing no reviews in the main list, but visible once you expand the listing.  I can&#039;t see a pattern yet.
The 2 example reviews shown on the first page seem to be the most recent, so another reason for business owners to keep up to speed on their reviews.
Cheers
Stuart]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike.<br />
It&#8217;s interesting there is no link to the places page (as with map results), only the website.<br />
There are a few listings showing no reviews in the main list, but visible once you expand the listing.  I can&#8217;t see a pattern yet.<br />
The 2 example reviews shown on the first page seem to be the most recent, so another reason for business owners to keep up to speed on their reviews.<br />
Cheers<br />
Stuart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
