<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Maps: The Yorks are Yucked Once Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/04/23/google-maps-the-yorks-are-yucked-once-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/04/23/google-maps-the-yorks-are-yucked-once-again/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:40:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Maps: York ME Found; Google gets Letter from Congresswoman &#124; Understanding Google Maps &#38; Local Search</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/04/23/google-maps-the-yorks-are-yucked-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-548188</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Maps: York ME Found; Google gets Letter from Congresswoman &#124; Understanding Google Maps &#38; Local Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 12:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9814#comment-548188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] good news is that York Me, having been lost repeatedly, has once again been [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] good news is that York Me, having been lost repeatedly, has once again been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Alstrom</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/04/23/google-maps-the-yorks-are-yucked-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-548157</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Alstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9814#comment-548157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an early adopter of Google search, as an enthusiastic user/promoter of Gmail, as a lover of Picasa, as a blogger...etc. our disappointment with Google is devastating.

Don&#039;t get me wrong. We are thrilled that this issue seems to be resolved. Thanks again to the Google person who finally solved this.

But when a company that you have endorsed, promoted to friends and family, used with enthusiasm a zillion times, becomes so clumsy that it won&#039;t respond to it&#039;s customers over a period of months, the sense of betrayal is very real.

Every company and every country has it&#039;s early surge of growth and customer focus. Then at some point, it loses its grip and becomes so large and bureaucratic that it becomes ineffective.

I truly hope that this event is an anomaly. I love most of what Google has done. I want to be that enthusiastic booster again. How could that happen? 

Google could begin by responding directly via phone call or email to customers with legitimate concerns. Otherwise we are left with the impression that we are just pawns in a huge corporate mosh pit.

A simple human outreach would have solved this problem and saved  the world of search thousands of hours of wasted time. Most of all, it would have restored Googles reputation of &quot;doing no evil&quot; as well as being the nimble organization it started out being.

Perhaps some top executives could actually read some of the &quot;reported problems&quot; and set goals for resolution for their engineers. Don&#039;&#039;t tell me it isn&#039;t practical. I used to be corporate dude in a major company. All it takes is the right attitude at the top.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an early adopter of Google search, as an enthusiastic user/promoter of Gmail, as a lover of Picasa, as a blogger&#8230;etc. our disappointment with Google is devastating.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong. We are thrilled that this issue seems to be resolved. Thanks again to the Google person who finally solved this.</p>
<p>But when a company that you have endorsed, promoted to friends and family, used with enthusiasm a zillion times, becomes so clumsy that it won&#8217;t respond to it&#8217;s customers over a period of months, the sense of betrayal is very real.</p>
<p>Every company and every country has it&#8217;s early surge of growth and customer focus. Then at some point, it loses its grip and becomes so large and bureaucratic that it becomes ineffective.</p>
<p>I truly hope that this event is an anomaly. I love most of what Google has done. I want to be that enthusiastic booster again. How could that happen? </p>
<p>Google could begin by responding directly via phone call or email to customers with legitimate concerns. Otherwise we are left with the impression that we are just pawns in a huge corporate mosh pit.</p>
<p>A simple human outreach would have solved this problem and saved  the world of search thousands of hours of wasted time. Most of all, it would have restored Googles reputation of &#8220;doing no evil&#8221; as well as being the nimble organization it started out being.</p>
<p>Perhaps some top executives could actually read some of the &#8220;reported problems&#8221; and set goals for resolution for their engineers. Don&#8221;t tell me it isn&#8217;t practical. I used to be corporate dude in a major company. All it takes is the right attitude at the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ehg</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/04/23/google-maps-the-yorks-are-yucked-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-548156</link>
		<dc:creator>ehg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9814#comment-548156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a&gt;

first of all: the matter is obvioulsly  fixed now (since yesterday) and Bill and others have confirmed this in the help forum as well.
Secondly:
the real scandal is not the geocoding error itself (not even the fact it is &quot;resurrected&quot; last August after fixing it the first time in 2009). 
The real scandal and shame for Google is the lack in their &quot;internal business processes&quot; not recognizing or taking any effective action on getting reported  the matter via their link &quot;report an error&quot; as done countless times by affected  people and especially by Bill since Sep 2010.

I notified Google about this scandal - hoping to get a response.&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></p>
<p>first of all: the matter is obvioulsly  fixed now (since yesterday) and Bill and others have confirmed this in the help forum as well.<br />
Secondly:<br />
the real scandal is not the geocoding error itself (not even the fact it is &#8220;resurrected&#8221; last August after fixing it the first time in 2009).<br />
The real scandal and shame for Google is the lack in their &#8220;internal business processes&#8221; not recognizing or taking any effective action on getting reported  the matter via their link &#8220;report an error&#8221; as done countless times by affected  people and especially by Bill since Sep 2010.</p>
<p>I notified Google about this scandal &#8211; hoping to get a response.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Alstrom</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/04/23/google-maps-the-yorks-are-yucked-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-548137</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Alstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9814#comment-548137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike,

It does seem to be fixed. My personal thanks to you for your help. I don&#039;t know how all this happened and I don&#039;t need to know. I just want to shout out thanks to anyone who jumped in and took an interest in what would seem to some a minor glitch. For us little folk in Maine it was huge, of course.

May the fix hold and may the force be with you.

Thanks again,
Bill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>It does seem to be fixed. My personal thanks to you for your help. I don&#8217;t know how all this happened and I don&#8217;t need to know. I just want to shout out thanks to anyone who jumped in and took an interest in what would seem to some a minor glitch. For us little folk in Maine it was huge, of course.</p>
<p>May the fix hold and may the force be with you.</p>
<p>Thanks again,<br />
Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Su</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/04/23/google-maps-the-yorks-are-yucked-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-548102</link>
		<dc:creator>Su</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9814#comment-548102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To answer the question as to whether this could be solved using Map Maker:  Some of us in town made a valiant attempt to do so.  We submitted Town of York Maine GIS boundaries and the edit was preliminarily approved quickly; but was denied by Google Reviewer Charlie. Reason: May adversely affect user/data owners.  ????????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer the question as to whether this could be solved using Map Maker:  Some of us in town made a valiant attempt to do so.  We submitted Town of York Maine GIS boundaries and the edit was preliminarily approved quickly; but was denied by Google Reviewer Charlie. Reason: May adversely affect user/data owners.  ????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchCap: The Day In Search, April 25, 2011</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/04/23/google-maps-the-yorks-are-yucked-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-547926</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchCap: The Day In Search, April 25, 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9814#comment-547926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Google Maps: The Yorks are Yucked Once Again, Mike Blumenthal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Maps: The Yorks are Yucked Once Again, Mike Blumenthal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/04/23/google-maps-the-yorks-are-yucked-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-547908</link>
		<dc:creator>earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9814#comment-547908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was wrong above.  Suppose there is a fire in York, Maine.  Look up fire department, York, Maine and the first thing you see is the fire department 30 miles North in Kennebunk.   (hm, if you do call the Kennebunk fire department I wonder if any of the Bush family can be found on the hook and ladder??)

Google still can&#039;t fix this problem after what appears to be about 2 years of contacts going back till 2009.

Yorkonians, get your politicians, the Associated Press, and local media in an uproar.  Google&#039;s NON RESPONSE modus operandi is screwing over your economic welfare and nobody is speaking up about this horrendous example of Monopolistic Arrogance!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wrong above.  Suppose there is a fire in York, Maine.  Look up fire department, York, Maine and the first thing you see is the fire department 30 miles North in Kennebunk.   (hm, if you do call the Kennebunk fire department I wonder if any of the Bush family can be found on the hook and ladder??)</p>
<p>Google still can&#8217;t fix this problem after what appears to be about 2 years of contacts going back till 2009.</p>
<p>Yorkonians, get your politicians, the Associated Press, and local media in an uproar.  Google&#8217;s NON RESPONSE modus operandi is screwing over your economic welfare and nobody is speaking up about this horrendous example of Monopolistic Arrogance!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Su</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/04/23/google-maps-the-yorks-are-yucked-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-547907</link>
		<dc:creator>Su</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9814#comment-547907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No not fixed.  Go directly to Maps and begin a fresh search for York Maine.  You will see that instead of being between Kittery &amp; Ogunquit on the seacoast, we are 26 miles north between Sanford &amp; Kennebunk.  We are the Town of York, not the York County seat which is where we are being pinpointed.  Go back to regular local search.  Type York Maine Museums or Golf Courses, or Doctors, or Dentists, Electricians, Lawyers, or Bed and Breakfast, etc.  ALL WRONG. Sometimes there are blended results and when you go to the Map it looks OK, but if you click for the second page of results on Maps, everyone is sent to our competitors in Kennebunkport and the map gets goofy with multiple pinpoints.

What happens in this busy tourist town when someone unfamiliar with the area needs a doctor ASAP on their mobile device?  Could be dire consequences.

Would appreciate anyone reTweeting this, as the story broke on Easter Saturday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No not fixed.  Go directly to Maps and begin a fresh search for York Maine.  You will see that instead of being between Kittery &amp; Ogunquit on the seacoast, we are 26 miles north between Sanford &amp; Kennebunk.  We are the Town of York, not the York County seat which is where we are being pinpointed.  Go back to regular local search.  Type York Maine Museums or Golf Courses, or Doctors, or Dentists, Electricians, Lawyers, or Bed and Breakfast, etc.  ALL WRONG. Sometimes there are blended results and when you go to the Map it looks OK, but if you click for the second page of results on Maps, everyone is sent to our competitors in Kennebunkport and the map gets goofy with multiple pinpoints.</p>
<p>What happens in this busy tourist town when someone unfamiliar with the area needs a doctor ASAP on their mobile device?  Could be dire consequences.</p>
<p>Would appreciate anyone reTweeting this, as the story broke on Easter Saturday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/04/23/google-maps-the-yorks-are-yucked-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-547906</link>
		<dc:creator>earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9814#comment-547906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not being a Maine native, it appears to me now that York is in the correct place in Google Maps.  Yorkerians, correct me if I&#039;m wrong.

On the other hand, what I gathered from the long history of correspondence that Google would at times effect a correction but the algo that operates G Maps would at some point automatically relocate York, once again.  Is that correct?

If currently correct I only hope you stay there on the web maps that have a monopoly on viewership.

If not, I&#039;d suggest raising holy hell with your politicians and all members of the media.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not being a Maine native, it appears to me now that York is in the correct place in Google Maps.  Yorkerians, correct me if I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
<p>On the other hand, what I gathered from the long history of correspondence that Google would at times effect a correction but the algo that operates G Maps would at some point automatically relocate York, once again.  Is that correct?</p>
<p>If currently correct I only hope you stay there on the web maps that have a monopoly on viewership.</p>
<p>If not, I&#8217;d suggest raising holy hell with your politicians and all members of the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/04/23/google-maps-the-yorks-are-yucked-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-547863</link>
		<dc:creator>earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9814#comment-547863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d be screaming at local politicians to raise the level of complaint and awareness.

Essentially google&#039;s mistakes on hard information, compounded by an utter and overwhelming disregard for the consequences are costing people their livelihoods.

Its the most compelling argument about the dangers of a monopoly.  Its one thing to describe monopolies in an abstract way.  Here is a monopoly that quite simply refuses to acknowledge its power and simply doesn&#039;t respond, while its very correctable errors are having a dire effect on a town&#039;s welfare.

Its a dangerous form of arrogance.  I&#039;d lobby local and state politicians, business groups that &quot;purportedly&quot; support the interests of the town, its businesses and its population, local and national media all to bring this situation to a head and do it quickly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be screaming at local politicians to raise the level of complaint and awareness.</p>
<p>Essentially google&#8217;s mistakes on hard information, compounded by an utter and overwhelming disregard for the consequences are costing people their livelihoods.</p>
<p>Its the most compelling argument about the dangers of a monopoly.  Its one thing to describe monopolies in an abstract way.  Here is a monopoly that quite simply refuses to acknowledge its power and simply doesn&#8217;t respond, while its very correctable errors are having a dire effect on a town&#8217;s welfare.</p>
<p>Its a dangerous form of arrogance.  I&#8217;d lobby local and state politicians, business groups that &#8220;purportedly&#8221; support the interests of the town, its businesses and its population, local and national media all to bring this situation to a head and do it quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
