<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cool Tool of the Trade &#8211; Capturing Full Screen Search Result Screenshots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/03/24/cool-tool-of-the-trade-capturing-full-screen-search-result-screenshots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/03/24/cool-tool-of-the-trade-capturing-full-screen-search-result-screenshots/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:16:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Long</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/03/24/cool-tool-of-the-trade-capturing-full-screen-search-result-screenshots/comment-page-1/#comment-549826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 21:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9582#comment-549826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. Didn&#039;t know this! Thanks! Now if Powerpoint would just respond with a scrollable screen I&#039;d be set. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Didn&#8217;t know this! Thanks! Now if Powerpoint would just respond with a scrollable screen I&#8217;d be set. <img src='http://blumenthals.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Seibert</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/03/24/cool-tool-of-the-trade-capturing-full-screen-search-result-screenshots/comment-page-1/#comment-548244</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Seibert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 19:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9582#comment-548244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome - finally a positive for FF 4.0!  Thanks, Mike.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome &#8211; finally a positive for FF 4.0!  Thanks, Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/03/24/cool-tool-of-the-trade-capturing-full-screen-search-result-screenshots/comment-page-1/#comment-546907</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9582#comment-546907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do think about it. but I have decided that my internet behavior is to be transparent. The amount of data that is collected is trivial compared to your smart phone. See NYT: Cellphones Track Your Every Move- http://t.co/jqJmazU and the interactive graphic that was created that shows the amount of data from 6 mos of cell phone use: http://t.co/CHcG64S

Data mining makes our lives, purchases, interests, political beliefs, economic status, spending patterns totally obvious whether I use Awesome or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think about it. but I have decided that my internet behavior is to be transparent. The amount of data that is collected is trivial compared to your smart phone. See NYT: Cellphones Track Your Every Move- <a href="http://t.co/jqJmazU">http://t.co/jqJmazU</a> and the interactive graphic that was created that shows the amount of data from 6 mos of cell phone use: <a href="http://t.co/CHcG64S">http://t.co/CHcG64S</a></p>
<p>Data mining makes our lives, purchases, interests, political beliefs, economic status, spending patterns totally obvious whether I use Awesome or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Reed</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/03/24/cool-tool-of-the-trade-capturing-full-screen-search-result-screenshots/comment-page-1/#comment-546904</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9582#comment-546904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike - Do you worry when you are told that by installing Awesome Screenshot it has access to all the information on your computer and all the sites you visit? That&#039;s why I go with SnagIt for this kind of thing. Sure I had to pay for it but it&#039;s worth it to not have to give up data. Overreacting? Would love to get your opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; Do you worry when you are told that by installing Awesome Screenshot it has access to all the information on your computer and all the sites you visit? That&#8217;s why I go with SnagIt for this kind of thing. Sure I had to pay for it but it&#8217;s worth it to not have to give up data. Overreacting? Would love to get your opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Kuiper</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/03/24/cool-tool-of-the-trade-capturing-full-screen-search-result-screenshots/comment-page-1/#comment-546893</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Kuiper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 02:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9582#comment-546893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve used Awesome for a while with my Chrome browser (Mac) and really like it, but used Pixlr Grabber on my previous version of FF. After this latest FF download I made a few mods which included (thanks for the remind Mike) the Awesome screen capture software... it&#039;s slick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used Awesome for a while with my Chrome browser (Mac) and really like it, but used Pixlr Grabber on my previous version of FF. After this latest FF download I made a few mods which included (thanks for the remind Mike) the Awesome screen capture software&#8230; it&#8217;s slick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/03/24/cool-tool-of-the-trade-capturing-full-screen-search-result-screenshots/comment-page-1/#comment-546855</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 12:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9582#comment-546855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jon

Just gave Screen Capture (by google) a shot and it is slick. As you point out, its fast and present a single screen. 

Ironic, on the Google Page where you actually download the plug-in I was only give the choice to &quot;capture visible content&quot; and no choice to capture the whole page. 

This instruction threw me for a loop (and fails the mike test :) ):
FAQ:
Q: Why can&#039;t I capture region or whole page on new tabs, extension gallery pages or local HTML pages?
A: To capture region or whole page, we need to run functions in content script, but content script can&#039;t be injected in these pages.

Although for obviously the same reason, Awesome does no better on the page. 

Pluses - fast, simple and integrated
Minus - only in Chrome and more limited sharing options.

A great choice if Chrome is your primary browser.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon</p>
<p>Just gave Screen Capture (by google) a shot and it is slick. As you point out, its fast and present a single screen. </p>
<p>Ironic, on the Google Page where you actually download the plug-in I was only give the choice to &#8220;capture visible content&#8221; and no choice to capture the whole page. </p>
<p>This instruction threw me for a loop (and fails the mike test <img src='http://blumenthals.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ):<br />
FAQ:<br />
Q: Why can&#8217;t I capture region or whole page on new tabs, extension gallery pages or local HTML pages?<br />
A: To capture region or whole page, we need to run functions in content script, but content script can&#8217;t be injected in these pages.</p>
<p>Although for obviously the same reason, Awesome does no better on the page. </p>
<p>Pluses &#8211; fast, simple and integrated<br />
Minus &#8211; only in Chrome and more limited sharing options.</p>
<p>A great choice if Chrome is your primary browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Klemin</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/03/24/cool-tool-of-the-trade-capturing-full-screen-search-result-screenshots/comment-page-1/#comment-546845</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Klemin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 01:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9582#comment-546845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mike

To answer your question, I prefer Screen Capture just because it feels a bit lighter and is quicker for me on my aging PC.

Also, I like how all of the options are on the same page as the captured image, including &quot;save&quot;. With AS I don&#039;t like how the &quot;save&quot; page shrinks the captured image, because I feel a need to look over the image on that page, but can&#039;t since it&#039;s not full screen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike</p>
<p>To answer your question, I prefer Screen Capture just because it feels a bit lighter and is quicker for me on my aging PC.</p>
<p>Also, I like how all of the options are on the same page as the captured image, including &#8220;save&#8221;. With AS I don&#8217;t like how the &#8220;save&#8221; page shrinks the captured image, because I feel a need to look over the image on that page, but can&#8217;t since it&#8217;s not full screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/03/24/cool-tool-of-the-trade-capturing-full-screen-search-result-screenshots/comment-page-1/#comment-546832</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9582#comment-546832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Brian

I was using Paparazzi until this came out. I had reasonable results as well... but this since it captures what&#039;s in your browser window allows for location to be set.... also the annotation while not fancy is adequate to prevent me from having to take it into photoshop where you can bet on spending another 20 minutes :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian</p>
<p>I was using Paparazzi until this came out. I had reasonable results as well&#8230; but this since it captures what&#8217;s in your browser window allows for location to be set&#8230;. also the annotation while not fancy is adequate to prevent me from having to take it into photoshop where you can bet on spending another 20 minutes <img src='http://blumenthals.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Combs</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/03/24/cool-tool-of-the-trade-capturing-full-screen-search-result-screenshots/comment-page-1/#comment-546831</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Combs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9582#comment-546831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haven&#039;t seen it drop graphics. But as it&#039;s a different instance of a web browser, results can certainly differ.

Problems capturing a page often have to do with the URL. If the URL is dynamically generated, and not something that can be entered directly, it&#039;ll cause problems.

Location is tough.

Still, in most case, I&#039;ve had good results with Paparazzi.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t seen it drop graphics. But as it&#8217;s a different instance of a web browser, results can certainly differ.</p>
<p>Problems capturing a page often have to do with the URL. If the URL is dynamically generated, and not something that can be entered directly, it&#8217;ll cause problems.</p>
<p>Location is tough.</p>
<p>Still, in most case, I&#8217;ve had good results with Paparazzi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/03/24/cool-tool-of-the-trade-capturing-full-screen-search-result-screenshots/comment-page-1/#comment-546830</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=9582#comment-546830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Brian

I have worked with Paparazzi and found it wanting in several regards... one it didn&#039;t always capture a page, two it often dropped graphics from the Google Blended results but more importantly didn&#039;t allow for user defined location to be set... have you seen those issues?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian</p>
<p>I have worked with Paparazzi and found it wanting in several regards&#8230; one it didn&#8217;t always capture a page, two it often dropped graphics from the Google Blended results but more importantly didn&#8217;t allow for user defined location to be set&#8230; have you seen those issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
