<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Customer Service: Up Against the Algo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/01/12/google-customer-service-up-against-the-algo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/01/12/google-customer-service-up-against-the-algo/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:22:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/01/12/google-customer-service-up-against-the-algo/comment-page-1/#comment-545801</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=8699#comment-545801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jami

I can guarantee you that deleting the listing and staring over, WILL NOT solve the problem. I tried it and it doesn&#039;t work. After a few days, (or weeks) it just remerges.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jami</p>
<p>I can guarantee you that deleting the listing and staring over, WILL NOT solve the problem. I tried it and it doesn&#8217;t work. After a few days, (or weeks) it just remerges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jami Broom</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/01/12/google-customer-service-up-against-the-algo/comment-page-1/#comment-545798</link>
		<dc:creator>Jami Broom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=8699#comment-545798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[haha, when I try to delete the listing completely from the map (Step 1 from above) , I get this message:

Your business listing has been suspended from Google Maps. 
Currently, we&#039;re updating our listings approximately every four weeks. Therefore, you may experience a slight delay in seeing your listing removed from Google Maps. You may resume your listing again in the future at any time.

so, who knows when they&#039;ll ever delete it, or if I should now proceed to step two?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, when I try to delete the listing completely from the map (Step 1 from above) , I get this message:</p>
<p>Your business listing has been suspended from Google Maps.<br />
Currently, we&#8217;re updating our listings approximately every four weeks. Therefore, you may experience a slight delay in seeing your listing removed from Google Maps. You may resume your listing again in the future at any time.</p>
<p>so, who knows when they&#8217;ll ever delete it, or if I should now proceed to step two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jami Broom</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/01/12/google-customer-service-up-against-the-algo/comment-page-1/#comment-545469</link>
		<dc:creator>Jami Broom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 03:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=8699#comment-545469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@mike

Did what the Google rep told you above actually work? Because they pretty much told me the same exact thing, only even after removing the original listing, the new listing somehow still was attached to the old listing, or the same problem still existed (because it was never fixed to begin with, only started over again.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mike</p>
<p>Did what the Google rep told you above actually work? Because they pretty much told me the same exact thing, only even after removing the original listing, the new listing somehow still was attached to the old listing, or the same problem still existed (because it was never fixed to begin with, only started over again.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/01/12/google-customer-service-up-against-the-algo/comment-page-1/#comment-545461</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=8699#comment-545461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@azilko

This really isn&#039;t the right spot to flag down the nearest Googler.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@azilko</p>
<p>This really isn&#8217;t the right spot to flag down the nearest Googler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azilko</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/01/12/google-customer-service-up-against-the-algo/comment-page-1/#comment-545453</link>
		<dc:creator>azilko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=8699#comment-545453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Ethan, can you have a look at this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Places/thread?tid=48ac92477625e0df&amp;hl=en&quot; title=&quot;google thread&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;? I know Mike was kind enough to provide insite into this, but I feel that we are all at a loss. Clearly data was merged, which caused a violation in the listing and kept me from being able to restore my ORIGINAL content. Then the listing was deleted publicly somehow, and is now in a pending review status. It is frustrating to play by the rules only to have this happen.

Like everyone here, I am just trying to understand it and find resolution. My hats off for Ethan and especially Mike for the support and going out of your way to help us out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ethan, can you have a look at this <a href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Places/thread?tid=48ac92477625e0df&amp;hl=en" title="google thread" rel="nofollow"></a>? I know Mike was kind enough to provide insite into this, but I feel that we are all at a loss. Clearly data was merged, which caused a violation in the listing and kept me from being able to restore my ORIGINAL content. Then the listing was deleted publicly somehow, and is now in a pending review status. It is frustrating to play by the rules only to have this happen.</p>
<p>Like everyone here, I am just trying to understand it and find resolution. My hats off for Ethan and especially Mike for the support and going out of your way to help us out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jami Broom</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/01/12/google-customer-service-up-against-the-algo/comment-page-1/#comment-545141</link>
		<dc:creator>Jami Broom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=8699#comment-545141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Ethan

and just to clarify -- I originally sent the account &quot;under review&quot; by using the &#039;report a problem&#039; feature, since the Google Places account was pulling in the wrong picture, the wrong phone number and the wrong URL (even though I specified these in the options). It was when I created the other account, after speaking with a Google rep that she told me to create multiple accounts to bypass the review. that account went up, but then, because it&#039;s attached to the phone number, went &#039;under review&#039; again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ethan</p>
<p>and just to clarify &#8212; I originally sent the account &#8220;under review&#8221; by using the &#8216;report a problem&#8217; feature, since the Google Places account was pulling in the wrong picture, the wrong phone number and the wrong URL (even though I specified these in the options). It was when I created the other account, after speaking with a Google rep that she told me to create multiple accounts to bypass the review. that account went up, but then, because it&#8217;s attached to the phone number, went &#8216;under review&#8217; again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jami Broom</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/01/12/google-customer-service-up-against-the-algo/comment-page-1/#comment-545140</link>
		<dc:creator>Jami Broom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=8699#comment-545140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Ethan

OK, thanks for following up. I hope they are able to get the turn around time on these reviews sped up drastically. It&#039;s still been six weeks since I added the new account.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ethan</p>
<p>OK, thanks for following up. I hope they are able to get the turn around time on these reviews sped up drastically. It&#8217;s still been six weeks since I added the new account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Russell</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/01/12/google-customer-service-up-against-the-algo/comment-page-1/#comment-545139</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=8699#comment-545139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jami,

The listings are under review because our automated systems believe they may not be in line with the Google Places Quality Guidelines. It&#039;s wrong that creating a new account would bypass the review process, and the rep shouldn&#039;t have said that. I&#039;ll follow up with the reps to clarify this.

As for the particular listing being under review for months, one thing to keep in mind is that changing the listing data and re-verifying may delay the review process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jami,</p>
<p>The listings are under review because our automated systems believe they may not be in line with the Google Places Quality Guidelines. It&#8217;s wrong that creating a new account would bypass the review process, and the rep shouldn&#8217;t have said that. I&#8217;ll follow up with the reps to clarify this.</p>
<p>As for the particular listing being under review for months, one thing to keep in mind is that changing the listing data and re-verifying may delay the review process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jami Broom</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/01/12/google-customer-service-up-against-the-algo/comment-page-1/#comment-545138</link>
		<dc:creator>Jami Broom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=8699#comment-545138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@mike

I just mean Adwords in general and am using the terms places/local interchangeably. I mean, why else wouldn&#039;t google provide customer service? -- it&#039;s a cost to them (and they may make even more money if they don&#039;t.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mike</p>
<p>I just mean Adwords in general and am using the terms places/local interchangeably. I mean, why else wouldn&#8217;t google provide customer service? &#8212; it&#8217;s a cost to them (and they may make even more money if they don&#8217;t.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2011/01/12/google-customer-service-up-against-the-algo/comment-page-1/#comment-545137</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=8699#comment-545137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jami
I can assure you that Google&#039;s service level in Local is unchanged before or after the intro of Google adwords for Local.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jami<br />
I can assure you that Google&#8217;s service level in Local is unchanged before or after the intro of Google adwords for Local.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
