<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Places Search: Hiding Address No Longer Buries Listing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/11/03/google-places-search-hiding-address-no-longer-buries-listing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/11/03/google-places-search-hiding-address-no-longer-buries-listing/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:15:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Google&#8217;s New Requirement to Hide a Home Business Appropriate? &#124; Understanding Google Places &#38; Local Search</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/11/03/google-places-search-hiding-address-no-longer-buries-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-568984</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google&#8217;s New Requirement to Hide a Home Business Appropriate? &#124; Understanding Google Places &#38; Local Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7845#comment-568984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you need to handle this guideline with reason. Some thoughts:  Does hiding an address affect rank?  Not any more. Hiding an address DID in the past affect ranking. It affected ranking in Google Maps and still [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you need to handle this guideline with reason. Some thoughts:  Does hiding an address affect rank?  Not any more. Hiding an address DID in the past affect ranking. It affected ranking in Google Maps and still [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Places Alert: Another Ugly Bug That Could Nuke Your Listing &#124; Understanding Google Maps &#38; Local Search</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/11/03/google-places-search-hiding-address-no-longer-buries-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-555802</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Places Alert: Another Ugly Bug That Could Nuke Your Listing &#124; Understanding Google Maps &#38; Local Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7845#comment-555802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] time you go in an edit your record. Thus it is necessary to deselect the check box or you will suffer the  outcome associated with hiding your address. YOUR LISTING WILL DROP OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time you go in an edit your record. Thus it is necessary to deselect the check box or you will suffer the  outcome associated with hiding your address. YOUR LISTING WILL DROP OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yelp Beats Google to Service Area based Rankings &#124; GEO Local SEO</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/11/03/google-places-search-hiding-address-no-longer-buries-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-546036</link>
		<dc:creator>Yelp Beats Google to Service Area based Rankings &#124; GEO Local SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7845#comment-546036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you right out of the rankings all together. That unfortunate side effect of hiding an address has been fixed since the roll out of the new blended oragnic-local results. But there still is no ranking benefits outside of the actual city your address is tied [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you right out of the rankings all together. That unfortunate side effect of hiding an address has been fixed since the roll out of the new blended oragnic-local results. But there still is no ranking benefits outside of the actual city your address is tied [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/11/03/google-places-search-hiding-address-no-longer-buries-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-540953</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7845#comment-540953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is good to know because I have a service business that does not rely on our physical address, I&#039;d rather not have the office address showing in the google listing, so long as I&#039;m not penalized for withholding it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good to know because I have a service business that does not rely on our physical address, I&#8217;d rather not have the office address showing in the google listing, so long as I&#8217;m not penalized for withholding it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiriamEllis</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/11/03/google-places-search-hiding-address-no-longer-buries-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-540864</link>
		<dc:creator>MiriamEllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7845#comment-540864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for clarifying that Will, and Mike, too!

What a big change this is. We are getting closer and closer to a solution for go-to-client type businesses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for clarifying that Will, and Mike, too!</p>
<p>What a big change this is. We are getting closer and closer to a solution for go-to-client type businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/11/03/google-places-search-hiding-address-no-longer-buries-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-540841</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7845#comment-540841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jim

It appears, from this and previous conversations, that the rules in Canada as to how Google treated businesses with hidden addresses are different. Not sure why but they were. I think under Place Search they are more likely to be the same.

@Miriam
I have been seeing &quot;hidden address&quot; results not in frequently. This search for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=plumber+syracuse&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;plumber syracuse&lt;/a&gt; shows one. 

It is still early in the Places Search game with lots of details to work about but it appears that if a client wants to hide their address on Google and are willing to work on the organic side of their site then you should b able to to take them on as clients. I do think that the website, always ranking #1 for the search, was the main reason they were able to over come the penalty of the hidden address.

I have corrected the body copy to (hopefully) make it more clear. Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim</p>
<p>It appears, from this and previous conversations, that the rules in Canada as to how Google treated businesses with hidden addresses are different. Not sure why but they were. I think under Place Search they are more likely to be the same.</p>
<p>@Miriam<br />
I have been seeing &#8220;hidden address&#8221; results not in frequently. This search for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=plumber+syracuse&#038;ie=utf-8&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;aq=t&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a">plumber syracuse</a> shows one. </p>
<p>It is still early in the Places Search game with lots of details to work about but it appears that if a client wants to hide their address on Google and are willing to work on the organic side of their site then you should b able to to take them on as clients. I do think that the website, always ranking #1 for the search, was the main reason they were able to over come the penalty of the hidden address.</p>
<p>I have corrected the body copy to (hopefully) make it more clear. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Scott</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/11/03/google-places-search-hiding-address-no-longer-buries-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-540840</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7845#comment-540840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Miriam,

The guy&#039;s business name is &quot;Greater Baton Rouge Signs&quot;.

Will]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Miriam,</p>
<p>The guy&#8217;s business name is &#8220;Greater Baton Rouge Signs&#8221;.</p>
<p>Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiriamEllis</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/11/03/google-places-search-hiding-address-no-longer-buries-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-540839</link>
		<dc:creator>MiriamEllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7845#comment-540839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike, 
I&#039;m trying to discern what this means in the workaday life of a Local SEO. In the past, if clients weren&#039;t willing to show their address, I didn&#039;t bother to list them in Maps, knowing the &#039;hide address&#039; would bury them. Now, this is not so. Now, we can proceed with these clients as we would for others, and sort of hope for the best if their website is well optimized?

What do you think about the competition factor? Do you think it&#039;s mainly the website of the example you&#039;ve given that accounts for this business outranking competitors who are listing addresses? What else could it be? It&#039;s really an amazing example.

Just wanted to point out, when I searched for &#039;greater baton rouge signs&#039; as indicated above, I wasn&#039;t getting any local results at all (i.e. no 7 pack of Place Search results), but when I searched for &#039;baton rouge signs&#039;, which I see in the search box in your screen shot, I see what you are seeing. You might want to fix that reference to &#039;greater&#039; in this post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
I&#8217;m trying to discern what this means in the workaday life of a Local SEO. In the past, if clients weren&#8217;t willing to show their address, I didn&#8217;t bother to list them in Maps, knowing the &#8216;hide address&#8217; would bury them. Now, this is not so. Now, we can proceed with these clients as we would for others, and sort of hope for the best if their website is well optimized?</p>
<p>What do you think about the competition factor? Do you think it&#8217;s mainly the website of the example you&#8217;ve given that accounts for this business outranking competitors who are listing addresses? What else could it be? It&#8217;s really an amazing example.</p>
<p>Just wanted to point out, when I searched for &#8216;greater baton rouge signs&#8217; as indicated above, I wasn&#8217;t getting any local results at all (i.e. no 7 pack of Place Search results), but when I searched for &#8216;baton rouge signs&#8217;, which I see in the search box in your screen shot, I see what you are seeing. You might want to fix that reference to &#8216;greater&#8217; in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rudnick</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/11/03/google-places-search-hiding-address-no-longer-buries-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-540838</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rudnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7845#comment-540838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm....I have to add our own exp here with not listing your city address....and being &quot;out in the boonies&quot; which for us didn&#039;t ever happen!

For quite awhile now, a small co we own that does web hosting (www.flamborocanadasytems.com) located here in our smal town of Waterdown has been very high in the Places index....ie a  search for &quot;Waterdown web hosting&quot; in Google.ca brings us up in the  top mounted 3-Pack at the B listing -- and that&#039;s been the same in this new Google BLEND PlaceSearch as well as in plain old Places now for over a year...

Note, we&#039;ve never listed our city address either, only the Phone # contact info..and still we rank up top in the old Places index and now the Google BLEND too...

:-)

Jim]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;.I have to add our own exp here with not listing your city address&#8230;.and being &#8220;out in the boonies&#8221; which for us didn&#8217;t ever happen!</p>
<p>For quite awhile now, a small co we own that does web hosting (www.flamborocanadasytems.com) located here in our smal town of Waterdown has been very high in the Places index&#8230;.ie a  search for &#8220;Waterdown web hosting&#8221; in Google.ca brings us up in the  top mounted 3-Pack at the B listing &#8212; and that&#8217;s been the same in this new Google BLEND PlaceSearch as well as in plain old Places now for over a year&#8230;</p>
<p>Note, we&#8217;ve never listed our city address either, only the Phone # contact info..and still we rank up top in the old Places index and now the Google BLEND too&#8230;</p>
<p> <img src='http://blumenthals.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Scott</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/11/03/google-places-search-hiding-address-no-longer-buries-listing/comment-page-1/#comment-540836</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7845#comment-540836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mike,

Yes, what I mean is that in at least one instance we&#039;re seeing poinpoint map style listings for &quot;Atlanta&quot; searches with an &quot;Alpharetta&quot; business.

We&#039;re also seeing a directory client take top of page for some local search phrases above the pinpoint loco-organic.

Will]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike,</p>
<p>Yes, what I mean is that in at least one instance we&#8217;re seeing poinpoint map style listings for &#8220;Atlanta&#8221; searches with an &#8220;Alpharetta&#8221; business.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re also seeing a directory client take top of page for some local search phrases above the pinpoint loco-organic.</p>
<p>Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
