<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yelp.com &amp; Unique Vistors: Would the Real Number Please Stand Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/10/06/yelp-com-uniques-vistors-would-the-real-number-please-stand-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/10/06/yelp-com-uniques-vistors-would-the-real-number-please-stand-up/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:56:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AhmedF</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/10/06/yelp-com-uniques-vistors-would-the-real-number-please-stand-up/comment-page-1/#comment-538773</link>
		<dc:creator>AhmedF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7564#comment-538773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google estimates 28 million estimated cookies, 10 million users.

Yelp uses Google Analytics, which would be far more accurate than any of these estimation sites. Plus they are likely getting a ton of mobile usage that these trackers cannot figure out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google estimates 28 million estimated cookies, 10 million users.</p>
<p>Yelp uses Google Analytics, which would be far more accurate than any of these estimation sites. Plus they are likely getting a ton of mobile usage that these trackers cannot figure out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/10/06/yelp-com-uniques-vistors-would-the-real-number-please-stand-up/comment-page-1/#comment-538585</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 01:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7564#comment-538585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems most companies can skew these results so they favor what they are trying to show. There are so many strange outcomes based on what you&#039;re using to measure. Not sure where they are getting their numbers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems most companies can skew these results so they favor what they are trying to show. There are so many strange outcomes based on what you&#8217;re using to measure. Not sure where they are getting their numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/10/06/yelp-com-uniques-vistors-would-the-real-number-please-stand-up/comment-page-1/#comment-538582</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 01:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7564#comment-538582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Dan
Your assessment makes sense but like David, I didn&#039; realize Trends showed hard numbers. 

One thing that is interesting is that complete, before their &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.compete.com/2010/06/16/enhanced-data-methodology-powers-new-features-and-new-capabilities/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;methodology change&lt;/a&gt; in June were in fact &lt;a href=&quot;http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/06/14/yelp-reviews-back-in-google-maps-as-their-com-growth-stops/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;were showing Yelp&lt;/a&gt; in the 25-30 million range. When I asked them about it, they said they were no longer counting traffic from Widgets and other embedded sources of traffic. Not sure how that would cause such a drop but it at least put their numbers in the range of Yelp, comscore &amp; google.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan<br />
Your assessment makes sense but like David, I didn&#8217; realize Trends showed hard numbers. </p>
<p>One thing that is interesting is that complete, before their <a href="http://blog.compete.com/2010/06/16/enhanced-data-methodology-powers-new-features-and-new-capabilities/">methodology change</a> in June were in fact <a href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/06/14/yelp-reviews-back-in-google-maps-as-their-com-growth-stops/">were showing Yelp</a> in the 25-30 million range. When I asked them about it, they said they were no longer counting traffic from Widgets and other embedded sources of traffic. Not sure how that would cause such a drop but it at least put their numbers in the range of Yelp, comscore &#038; google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kyle</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/10/06/yelp-com-uniques-vistors-would-the-real-number-please-stand-up/comment-page-1/#comment-538571</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7564#comment-538571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Dan 

How do you get Google Trends to display a hard number?  I thought it was only used for determining scale.  According to Google Trends the traffic from the other countries appears to be insignificant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan </p>
<p>How do you get Google Trends to display a hard number?  I thought it was only used for determining scale.  According to Google Trends the traffic from the other countries appears to be insignificant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby Carswell</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/10/06/yelp-com-uniques-vistors-would-the-real-number-please-stand-up/comment-page-1/#comment-538536</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby Carswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7564#comment-538536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;the many ways that unique visitors can be counted&quot;
this seems to always be a problem.
bobby]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the many ways that unique visitors can be counted&#8221;<br />
this seems to always be a problem.<br />
bobby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/10/06/yelp-com-uniques-vistors-would-the-real-number-please-stand-up/comment-page-1/#comment-538513</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7564#comment-538513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These numbers will just be for US visitors (not sure about Comscore, but definitely Qunacast), and Yelp were probably referring to all their sites (US, Canada, UK, France, Ireland, Germany). Furthermore a lot of people browse Yelp whilst at work, which messes with the way these services collect data. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if they were doing 30 - 40 million uniques. About 25m US and 10m ish the rest. Google trends (which I find is a better source if you aren&#039;t bothered about the lag) would put yelp.com at around 25m.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These numbers will just be for US visitors (not sure about Comscore, but definitely Qunacast), and Yelp were probably referring to all their sites (US, Canada, UK, France, Ireland, Germany). Furthermore a lot of people browse Yelp whilst at work, which messes with the way these services collect data. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if they were doing 30 &#8211; 40 million uniques. About 25m US and 10m ish the rest. Google trends (which I find is a better source if you aren&#8217;t bothered about the lag) would put yelp.com at around 25m.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kyle</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/10/06/yelp-com-uniques-vistors-would-the-real-number-please-stand-up/comment-page-1/#comment-538468</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=7564#comment-538468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting.  When comparing data I have access to, I&#039;ve always found ComScore to be inflated.  Quantcast and Compete have generally had more accurate data.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  When comparing data I have access to, I&#8217;ve always found ComScore to be inflated.  Quantcast and Compete have generally had more accurate data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
