<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Often Does Google Show A Local Map? More than a 1 billion times per month!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/04/29/how-often-does-google-show-a-map-more-than-a-1-billion-times-per-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/04/29/how-often-does-google-show-a-map-more-than-a-1-billion-times-per-month/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:55:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Places vs Facebook Places: It’s Search vs. Social</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/04/29/how-often-does-google-show-a-map-more-than-a-1-billion-times-per-month/comment-page-1/#comment-524414</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Places vs Facebook Places: It’s Search vs. Social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=6557#comment-524414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] queries with local intent are estimated to make up roughly 20% of all queries, and almost everybody clicks on one of the top three results, this aggressive placement of their [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] queries with local intent are estimated to make up roughly 20% of all queries, and almost everybody clicks on one of the top three results, this aggressive placement of their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/04/29/how-often-does-google-show-a-map-more-than-a-1-billion-times-per-month/comment-page-1/#comment-483054</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=6557#comment-483054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am doing maaavalously!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am doing maaavalously!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiriamEllis</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/04/29/how-often-does-google-show-a-map-more-than-a-1-billion-times-per-month/comment-page-1/#comment-483052</link>
		<dc:creator>MiriamEllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=6557#comment-483052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see. Well, that makes more sense. Such different numbers, but when you look at it that way, I can understand the variation. Thanks, Mike. Hope you are doing well!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see. Well, that makes more sense. Such different numbers, but when you look at it that way, I can understand the variation. Thanks, Mike. Hope you are doing well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/04/29/how-often-does-google-show-a-map-more-than-a-1-billion-times-per-month/comment-page-1/#comment-483029</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=6557#comment-483029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes I have heard them and it comes down to the definition of &quot;local intent&quot;. Greg Sterling has argued for those higher numbers with the logic that even a search on a word like &quot;Ford&quot; ultimately often involves local intent. IE a very broad definition.

My sense is that when Google used the term in their rollout of Places it meant, &quot;mostly explicit local intent&quot;...ie either it included the local modifier or could be reasonably assumed based on their experience to likely include local intent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I have heard them and it comes down to the definition of &#8220;local intent&#8221;. Greg Sterling has argued for those higher numbers with the logic that even a search on a word like &#8220;Ford&#8221; ultimately often involves local intent. IE a very broad definition.</p>
<p>My sense is that when Google used the term in their rollout of Places it meant, &#8220;mostly explicit local intent&#8221;&#8230;ie either it included the local modifier or could be reasonably assumed based on their experience to likely include local intent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiriamEllis</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2010/04/29/how-often-does-google-show-a-map-more-than-a-1-billion-times-per-month/comment-page-1/#comment-483025</link>
		<dc:creator>MiriamEllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=6557#comment-483025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, more than 1 billion times a month! That is quite a figure.

One thing I&#039;m puzzled about is that quote of 20% of searches having a local intent. I have also seen speakers at conferences quoted as saying that anything from 40%-60% of searches have a local intent. Have you heard these figures, too, Mike? What do you make of them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, more than 1 billion times a month! That is quite a figure.</p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;m puzzled about is that quote of 20% of searches having a local intent. I have also seen speakers at conferences quoted as saying that anything from 40%-60% of searches have a local intent. Have you heard these figures, too, Mike? What do you make of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
