<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Maps Adds New &#8220;Report A Problem&#8221; Link for Business Listing Spam &amp; Errors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/12/23/google-maps-adds-new-report-a-problem-link-for-business-listing-spam-errors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/12/23/google-maps-adds-new-report-a-problem-link-for-business-listing-spam-errors/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Untold Story of 2011: Google&#8217;s Significant Investments in a Google Places Support Structure &#124; Understanding Google Maps &#38; Local Search</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/12/23/google-maps-adds-new-report-a-problem-link-for-business-listing-spam-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-564411</link>
		<dc:creator>The Untold Story of 2011: Google&#8217;s Significant Investments in a Google Places Support Structure &#124; Understanding Google Maps &#38; Local Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=5662#comment-564411</guid>
		<description>[...] a Problem: With the exception of map based problem reports, Report a Problem, which came out in late 2009, always seemed like a deep, dark well for the burial of Places issues. I, a careful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a Problem: With the exception of map based problem reports, Report a Problem, which came out in late 2009, always seemed like a deep, dark well for the burial of Places issues. I, a careful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/12/23/google-maps-adds-new-report-a-problem-link-for-business-listing-spam-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-499067</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=5662#comment-499067</guid>
		<description>Yes it is not in all countries yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it is not in all countries yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/12/23/google-maps-adds-new-report-a-problem-link-for-business-listing-spam-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-499062</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=5662#comment-499062</guid>
		<description>it seams this feature is not available in Italy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it seams this feature is not available in Italy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/12/23/google-maps-adds-new-report-a-problem-link-for-business-listing-spam-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-452608</link>
		<dc:creator>Earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=5662#comment-452608</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve complained in Double digits abt a couple of businesses with outrageous name spam.  At its worst a spammy record in the LBC not only uses a town name, an erroneous word (that is better for search traffic).  But it has STOLEN or at least copied the official and legal name of a business.

Lots of submissions.   No actions by Google.  What is an SMB to do?  

Now if I were Holiday Inn...they would have fixed this already!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve complained in Double digits abt a couple of businesses with outrageous name spam.  At its worst a spammy record in the LBC not only uses a town name, an erroneous word (that is better for search traffic).  But it has STOLEN or at least copied the official and legal name of a business.</p>
<p>Lots of submissions.   No actions by Google.  What is an SMB to do?  </p>
<p>Now if I were Holiday Inn&#8230;they would have fixed this already!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avante Gardens - florals unique, Anaheim, CA - Orange County Florist Since 1984</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/12/23/google-maps-adds-new-report-a-problem-link-for-business-listing-spam-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-451972</link>
		<dc:creator>Avante Gardens - florals unique, Anaheim, CA - Orange County Florist Since 1984</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=5662#comment-451972</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;We&#039;re a Google Favorite Place...&lt;/strong&gt;

The buzz about Google sending out Favorite Places packets with window decals to 100,000 of the “most...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We&#8217;re a Google Favorite Place&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The buzz about Google sending out Favorite Places packets with window decals to 100,000 of the “most&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/12/23/google-maps-adds-new-report-a-problem-link-for-business-listing-spam-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-451853</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=5662#comment-451853</guid>
		<description>@Adriam

The feature is available in only some european countries and only on unclaimed listings. For example it is in Austria, France and Germany but not UK, Ireland or Spain.

Generally it is available where the chart indicates that &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=168339&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;community edits are available&lt;/a&gt; but not always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adriam</p>
<p>The feature is available in only some european countries and only on unclaimed listings. For example it is in Austria, France and Germany but not UK, Ireland or Spain.</p>
<p>Generally it is available where the chart indicates that <a href="http://maps.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=168339">community edits are available</a> but not always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/12/23/google-maps-adds-new-report-a-problem-link-for-business-listing-spam-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-451851</link>
		<dc:creator>Earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=5662#comment-451851</guid>
		<description>Mike:  Unfortunately the spam remains.  Reporting is made, and I don&#039;t see actions.  Spam can continue for months on end, impacting small businesses.

Why did Google bother establishing guidelines and creating mechanisms for reporting them when in fact they don&#039;t act on them.

If you want to see this situation at an absurd level take a look at this search:
http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&amp;hl=en&amp;rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUS349&amp;q=madrid+bike+tours&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=


Take a look at that record, then revert to this message in google groups for maps where you commented...and where Cecelia declared it a spam name:  http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/maps/thread?tid=0e1de808d533cfd9&amp;hl=en#all

We saw the question back on 12/14.  Google Employee Cecelia deemed it spammy.  Cecelia described reporting spam.  Spam reporting was discussed in depth, by you and Cecelia.

Yet that very thread, shows spam, shows it not being changed, discusses spam reporting.....and irony of ironies.   Google sees it and does nothing.

If that single thread is not an invitation to spam name records, I don&#039;t know what is.  How can Google not react to the spam reports?  How can they seemingly encourage it, by in a very thread wherein they discuss Spam reporting and then let it sit undisturbed for 2 weeks.

It looks to me like Google encourages Spam.

I have one of those SMB&#039;s you reference above that is losing business due to spam records.  How many spam reports do I need to submit?  50, 100, 1,000.  Will it matter?

Google is a big black hole in so far as customer service is concerned.  In many cases its engineered algo&#039;s encourage spam.  They can recreate false data, but Google does nothing about them.

Its a shame Google shirks its responsibility.  By virtue of its control of search it has a monopoly on a critical element of business.  It is not responsible in dealing with the algorithmec errors it creates.  

Soon questions of monopoly are going to rise about the merger of MSN and Yahoo.  Google will be questioned on this issue.  I can&#039;t wait to show my evidence as to how powerful, monopolistic, and irresponsible Google is.

Step up, Google.  Act on the Spam.  Above all else, don&#039;t set up a system that blatently encourages it....then sit back and study it without recognizing the consequences.  

Act on it!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:  Unfortunately the spam remains.  Reporting is made, and I don&#8217;t see actions.  Spam can continue for months on end, impacting small businesses.</p>
<p>Why did Google bother establishing guidelines and creating mechanisms for reporting them when in fact they don&#8217;t act on them.</p>
<p>If you want to see this situation at an absurd level take a look at this search:<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&#038;hl=en&#038;rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUS349&#038;q=madrid+bike+tours&#038;aq=f&#038;oq=&#038;aqi=">http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&#038;hl=en&#038;rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUS349&#038;q=madrid+bike+tours&#038;aq=f&#038;oq=&#038;aqi=</a></p>
<p>Take a look at that record, then revert to this message in google groups for maps where you commented&#8230;and where Cecelia declared it a spam name:  <a href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/maps/thread?tid=0e1de808d533cfd9&#038;hl=en#all">http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/maps/thread?tid=0e1de808d533cfd9&#038;hl=en#all</a></p>
<p>We saw the question back on 12/14.  Google Employee Cecelia deemed it spammy.  Cecelia described reporting spam.  Spam reporting was discussed in depth, by you and Cecelia.</p>
<p>Yet that very thread, shows spam, shows it not being changed, discusses spam reporting&#8230;..and irony of ironies.   Google sees it and does nothing.</p>
<p>If that single thread is not an invitation to spam name records, I don&#8217;t know what is.  How can Google not react to the spam reports?  How can they seemingly encourage it, by in a very thread wherein they discuss Spam reporting and then let it sit undisturbed for 2 weeks.</p>
<p>It looks to me like Google encourages Spam.</p>
<p>I have one of those SMB&#8217;s you reference above that is losing business due to spam records.  How many spam reports do I need to submit?  50, 100, 1,000.  Will it matter?</p>
<p>Google is a big black hole in so far as customer service is concerned.  In many cases its engineered algo&#8217;s encourage spam.  They can recreate false data, but Google does nothing about them.</p>
<p>Its a shame Google shirks its responsibility.  By virtue of its control of search it has a monopoly on a critical element of business.  It is not responsible in dealing with the algorithmec errors it creates.  </p>
<p>Soon questions of monopoly are going to rise about the merger of MSN and Yahoo.  Google will be questioned on this issue.  I can&#8217;t wait to show my evidence as to how powerful, monopolistic, and irresponsible Google is.</p>
<p>Step up, Google.  Act on the Spam.  Above all else, don&#8217;t set up a system that blatently encourages it&#8230;.then sit back and study it without recognizing the consequences.  </p>
<p>Act on it!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Cameron</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/12/23/google-maps-adds-new-report-a-problem-link-for-business-listing-spam-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-451830</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=5662#comment-451830</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Can&#039;t seem to find this feature in the UK. I&#039;ve been trying to claimback a couple of reviews erroneously attributed to a competitor. I keep on reporting this from the report spam on the review link, but get no response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t seem to find this feature in the UK. I&#8217;ve been trying to claimback a couple of reviews erroneously attributed to a competitor. I keep on reporting this from the report spam on the review link, but get no response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santa Claus was successfully tracked by Norad : Web Frog</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/12/23/google-maps-adds-new-report-a-problem-link-for-business-listing-spam-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-451655</link>
		<dc:creator>Santa Claus was successfully tracked by Norad : Web Frog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 06:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=5662#comment-451655</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Maps Adds New “Report A Problem” Link for Business Listing &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Maps Adds New “Report A Problem” Link for Business Listing &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Sherland</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/12/23/google-maps-adds-new-report-a-problem-link-for-business-listing-spam-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-451555</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=5662#comment-451555</guid>
		<description>This is a wonderful development -- thanks for reporting on it Mike.  I&#039;ve used the old report format several times to report SPAM and it was tedious.  I&#039;m glad Google is making the &quot;self policing&quot; part of their strategy easier for the &quot;self police.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a wonderful development &#8212; thanks for reporting on it Mike.  I&#8217;ve used the old report format several times to report SPAM and it was tedious.  I&#8217;m glad Google is making the &#8220;self policing&#8221; part of their strategy easier for the &#8220;self police.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 507/507 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blumenthals.com @ 2012-05-24 07:24:04 -->
