<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visitation Stats Showing Gains for Chrome and Severe Share Loss for IE Amongst the Local Crowd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/10/13/visitation-stats-showing-strong-gains-for-chrome-and-share-loss-for-ie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/10/13/visitation-stats-showing-strong-gains-for-chrome-and-share-loss-for-ie/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:38:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/10/13/visitation-stats-showing-strong-gains-for-chrome-and-share-loss-for-ie/comment-page-1/#comment-433407</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=4800#comment-433407</guid>
		<description>Alistair

Thanks for stopping by and sharing your experiences with Chrome. Being on Safari (with a Firefox supplement) I have not been as motivated to try Chrome but after this recommendation, I will give it a go. Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alistair</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by and sharing your experiences with Chrome. Being on Safari (with a Firefox supplement) I have not been as motivated to try Chrome but after this recommendation, I will give it a go. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/10/13/visitation-stats-showing-strong-gains-for-chrome-and-share-loss-for-ie/comment-page-1/#comment-433404</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=4800#comment-433404</guid>
		<description>Since installing Chrome, I now use it as my default browser and only use Firefox &amp; subsequently IE if I have to (browser sniffing, incompatibility, testing &amp; so on).

I love that it is blazingly fast, I love the separate process per window and the memory management. I regularly have between 2-5 windows open with 5-25 tabs in each one and won&#039;t close Chrome for over a week at a time and it just keeps on handing out the love.

When people ask me about it, I find it hard not to rave about it to them and suggest they install it to see if they like it as well. What shocked me was that I have switched browsers nearly exclusively and without Chrome having the plugin architecture that many have come to love with Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since installing Chrome, I now use it as my default browser and only use Firefox &amp; subsequently IE if I have to (browser sniffing, incompatibility, testing &amp; so on).</p>
<p>I love that it is blazingly fast, I love the separate process per window and the memory management. I regularly have between 2-5 windows open with 5-25 tabs in each one and won&#8217;t close Chrome for over a week at a time and it just keeps on handing out the love.</p>
<p>When people ask me about it, I find it hard not to rave about it to them and suggest they install it to see if they like it as well. What shocked me was that I have switched browsers nearly exclusively and without Chrome having the plugin architecture that many have come to love with Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 367/368 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blumenthals.com @ 2012-02-09 11:18:46 -->
