<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What not to do when you visit Mountain View</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/06/16/what-not-to-do-when-you-visit-mountain-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/06/16/what-not-to-do-when-you-visit-mountain-view/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Y</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/06/16/what-not-to-do-when-you-visit-mountain-view/comment-page-1/#comment-397014</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=3838#comment-397014</guid>
		<description>These locksmiths all look like spam to me.  The usual suspects and some of the bad spammers as well. 
 
The only locksmith that MIGHT be ok is ElCaminoLocksmith.com.  Their Locksmith license checks out to match their name.  But their contractors license looks suspect.  They have a “B” license (that’s odd), they show no employees (but several phone numbers), and do not have workers comp insurance. So possibly OK, but they look to be a one person business with several phone numbers to look local.  At the very least they are doing Black Hat stuff to get better placement.  
 
That is sad, the one that MAY be OK has some serious issues.  So best to avoid all of the Mountain View Locksmiths listed on Google. 

More amazing is the locksmith that Google uses for access control, (aalock.com) is not listed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These locksmiths all look like spam to me.  The usual suspects and some of the bad spammers as well. </p>
<p>The only locksmith that MIGHT be ok is ElCaminoLocksmith.com.  Their Locksmith license checks out to match their name.  But their contractors license looks suspect.  They have a “B” license (that’s odd), they show no employees (but several phone numbers), and do not have workers comp insurance. So possibly OK, but they look to be a one person business with several phone numbers to look local.  At the very least they are doing Black Hat stuff to get better placement.  </p>
<p>That is sad, the one that MAY be OK has some serious issues.  So best to avoid all of the Mountain View Locksmiths listed on Google. </p>
<p>More amazing is the locksmith that Google uses for access control, (aalock.com) is not listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/06/16/what-not-to-do-when-you-visit-mountain-view/comment-page-1/#comment-397008</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=3838#comment-397008</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t considered one until just this minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t considered one until just this minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiriamEllis</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/06/16/what-not-to-do-when-you-visit-mountain-view/comment-page-1/#comment-397005</link>
		<dc:creator>MiriamEllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=3838#comment-397005</guid>
		<description>Do I feel a Microsoft joke coming on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I feel a Microsoft joke coming on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/06/16/what-not-to-do-when-you-visit-mountain-view/comment-page-1/#comment-397004</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=3838#comment-397004</guid>
		<description>@Mirian
You think they actually look out the windows? Do they have windows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mirian<br />
You think they actually look out the windows? Do they have windows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiriamEllis</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/06/16/what-not-to-do-when-you-visit-mountain-view/comment-page-1/#comment-397002</link>
		<dc:creator>MiriamEllis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=3838#comment-397002</guid>
		<description>Lovely screenshots, Mike. I guess you&#039;ve answered your own question - Google is not looking out their windows. Perhaps Google should adopt a clean-up-your-own-backyard-first policy and then they could apply what they learn about cleaning up Mountain View to the rest of the American cities they&#039;ve indexed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely screenshots, Mike. I guess you&#8217;ve answered your own question &#8211; Google is not looking out their windows. Perhaps Google should adopt a clean-up-your-own-backyard-first policy and then they could apply what they learn about cleaning up Mountain View to the rest of the American cities they&#8217;ve indexed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katiesp</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/06/16/what-not-to-do-when-you-visit-mountain-view/comment-page-1/#comment-396936</link>
		<dc:creator>Katiesp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=3838#comment-396936</guid>
		<description>Surely if they all use the term good hotel no doubt inserted in the name field in the listing then one does not gain advantage over the other?

How is relevancy covered here? I know google expect business to be portrayed exactly as they would be in say the telephone directory, but lets say for example some searched out a hotel with parking facilities in central LA . Using &#039;LA Hotel with Parking&#039;. Would it be such a mistake to add Name Hotel with parking as the business description?
You are delivering relevancy which is what google demands and this would be a recognised search term?

Clearly this wouldn&#039;t be as it was in the telephone directory so the user in that circumstance would have to call round to see who could offer him what. Not exactly the user friendly experience demanded is it?

Adding the ancillary info into the  listing info does not always return the item in the SERP whereas in the title listing it will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely if they all use the term good hotel no doubt inserted in the name field in the listing then one does not gain advantage over the other?</p>
<p>How is relevancy covered here? I know google expect business to be portrayed exactly as they would be in say the telephone directory, but lets say for example some searched out a hotel with parking facilities in central LA . Using &#8216;LA Hotel with Parking&#8217;. Would it be such a mistake to add Name Hotel with parking as the business description?<br />
You are delivering relevancy which is what google demands and this would be a recognised search term?</p>
<p>Clearly this wouldn&#8217;t be as it was in the telephone directory so the user in that circumstance would have to call round to see who could offer him what. Not exactly the user friendly experience demanded is it?</p>
<p>Adding the ancillary info into the  listing info does not always return the item in the SERP whereas in the title listing it will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PureSheer</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/06/16/what-not-to-do-when-you-visit-mountain-view/comment-page-1/#comment-396928</link>
		<dc:creator>PureSheer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=3838#comment-396928</guid>
		<description>&amp; to think that only 1-3 locksmith companies controlling the 10 box over there..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&amp; to think that only 1-3 locksmith companies controlling the 10 box over there..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobthebuilder</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/06/16/what-not-to-do-when-you-visit-mountain-view/comment-page-1/#comment-396923</link>
		<dc:creator>bobthebuilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=3838#comment-396923</guid>
		<description>Brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 473/473 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blumenthals.com @ 2012-05-24 03:52:25 -->
