<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Maps: Manic Merging of Business Listings due to Algo Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/04/29/google-maps-merging-mania-due-to-algo-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/04/29/google-maps-merging-mania-due-to-algo-change/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:17:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Maps: Citation Conflation or Where have my Citations Gone? &#124; Understanding Google Maps &#38; Local Search</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/04/29/google-maps-merging-mania-due-to-algo-change/comment-page-2/#comment-465500</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Maps: Citation Conflation or Where have my Citations Gone? &#124; Understanding Google Maps &#38; Local Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2255#comment-465500</guid>
		<description>[...] are listed adjacent to each other on a web page that Google does not parse correctly and will, like listing mergings, cause hard feelings amongst close [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are listed adjacent to each other on a web page that Google does not parse correctly and will, like listing mergings, cause hard feelings amongst close [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/04/29/google-maps-merging-mania-due-to-algo-change/comment-page-1/#comment-461666</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2255#comment-461666</guid>
		<description>I stumbled across this post from another blog I was reading. I find the information in this post very disturbing. I am in an extremely competitive business in a large city (NYC) and the last thing that I need is to have my information merged with some competitors info in Google maps. As a small business owner we have enough to do already and you would think that a company with the technology that Google has that they would be able to get things right. I can understand a mistake here and there but what I&#039;m getting from this post and the comments is that this is a problem that is wide spread. I guess I&#039;m going to  have to take out some time from my busy day and do some research now and see how this is affecting my business as I can see how it is highly probable that this is happening in my industry with the amount of competitors that I have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stumbled across this post from another blog I was reading. I find the information in this post very disturbing. I am in an extremely competitive business in a large city (NYC) and the last thing that I need is to have my information merged with some competitors info in Google maps. As a small business owner we have enough to do already and you would think that a company with the technology that Google has that they would be able to get things right. I can understand a mistake here and there but what I&#8217;m getting from this post and the comments is that this is a problem that is wide spread. I guess I&#8217;m going to  have to take out some time from my busy day and do some research now and see how this is affecting my business as I can see how it is highly probable that this is happening in my industry with the amount of competitors that I have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April &#8216;09: Best Search/Marketing Posts</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/04/29/google-maps-merging-mania-due-to-algo-change/comment-page-1/#comment-460406</link>
		<dc:creator>April &#8216;09: Best Search/Marketing Posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2255#comment-460406</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Blumenthal: Google Maps: Manic Merging of Business Listings due to Algo Change [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Blumenthal: Google Maps: Manic Merging of Business Listings due to Algo Change [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loci2009: Matt McGee&#8217;s Most Important Developments in Local Search for 2009 &#124; Understanding Google Maps &#38; Local Search</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/04/29/google-maps-merging-mania-due-to-algo-change/comment-page-1/#comment-454566</link>
		<dc:creator>Loci2009: Matt McGee&#8217;s Most Important Developments in Local Search for 2009 &#124; Understanding Google Maps &#38; Local Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2255#comment-454566</guid>
		<description>[...] job of writing about Google&#8217;s ongoing problems with spam, hijacked listings, and general technical incompetence than you. So Google&#8217;s local track record is far from perfect &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] job of writing about Google&#8217;s ongoing problems with spam, hijacked listings, and general technical incompetence than you. So Google&#8217;s local track record is far from perfect &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Year In Review: Local Search &#38; Maps</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/04/29/google-maps-merging-mania-due-to-algo-change/comment-page-1/#comment-452582</link>
		<dc:creator>Year In Review: Local Search &#38; Maps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2255#comment-452582</guid>
		<description>[...] featuring merged listing information also raised quite an outcry among SEO&#8217;s and SMB&#8217;s numerous times throughout the year, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] featuring merged listing information also raised quite an outcry among SEO&#8217;s and SMB&#8217;s numerous times throughout the year, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/04/29/google-maps-merging-mania-due-to-algo-change/comment-page-1/#comment-446773</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2255#comment-446773</guid>
		<description>@Boruch 
That is consistent with the clustering patent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Boruch<br />
That is consistent with the clustering patent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boruch Fishman</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/04/29/google-maps-merging-mania-due-to-algo-change/comment-page-1/#comment-446654</link>
		<dc:creator>Boruch Fishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2255#comment-446654</guid>
		<description>First of all, I noticed in the initial cases the number of shared letters in the name seems to be significant. For example: The Inn on Lake Superior vrs. South Pier Inn. 
Inn=Inn and South = Su...o  Pier= Peri  Su...o + Peri =Superio, which makes Inn Superio = Inn on Lake Superior 
As a test, I fixed one merging problem by changing one branch of Tucson Computer Repair to Broadway Computer Repair.

Recently I have noticed that  geographically close branches of a company using the same telephone number might or might not be merged. I follow four branches of a company which share two phones. Two of the companies merged two didn&#039;t. This all suggests that the merging algorithm takes into consideration a lot of relative factors, each assigned certain mathematical values. When the combined sum goes over the top Zammo! they merge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I noticed in the initial cases the number of shared letters in the name seems to be significant. For example: The Inn on Lake Superior vrs. South Pier Inn.<br />
Inn=Inn and South = Su&#8230;o  Pier= Peri  Su&#8230;o + Peri =Superio, which makes Inn Superio = Inn on Lake Superior<br />
As a test, I fixed one merging problem by changing one branch of Tucson Computer Repair to Broadway Computer Repair.</p>
<p>Recently I have noticed that  geographically close branches of a company using the same telephone number might or might not be merged. I follow four branches of a company which share two phones. Two of the companies merged two didn&#8217;t. This all suggests that the merging algorithm takes into consideration a lot of relative factors, each assigned certain mathematical values. When the combined sum goes over the top Zammo! they merge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/04/29/google-maps-merging-mania-due-to-algo-change/comment-page-1/#comment-444940</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2255#comment-444940</guid>
		<description>@Joe
You need to track down where the extra listing is coming from and why they trust it more than yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe<br />
You need to track down where the extra listing is coming from and why they trust it more than yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/04/29/google-maps-merging-mania-due-to-algo-change/comment-page-1/#comment-444931</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2255#comment-444931</guid>
		<description>My local map listing with google doesn&#039;t show any links or reviews from other local business listings (and I have plenty).  I think this is causing me to be ranked lower.

In doing a map search of my business, I always find one extra listing that is unverified but has all the links I hope for.  So I go in claim it, edit itand verify it with the PIN, then it ends up merging with my current active listing but all the links disappear.  Then once again a second unverified listing shows up with all the linking.  I have been through this process 3 times.

You&#039;re the only one who can help Mike.

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My local map listing with google doesn&#8217;t show any links or reviews from other local business listings (and I have plenty).  I think this is causing me to be ranked lower.</p>
<p>In doing a map search of my business, I always find one extra listing that is unverified but has all the links I hope for.  So I go in claim it, edit itand verify it with the PIN, then it ends up merging with my current active listing but all the links disappear.  Then once again a second unverified listing shows up with all the linking.  I have been through this process 3 times.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re the only one who can help Mike.</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/04/29/google-maps-merging-mania-due-to-algo-change/comment-page-1/#comment-444844</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2255#comment-444844</guid>
		<description>@Jim

I would (at least temorarily) change the primary details of the second listing to the same primary details as the main listing and remove all enhanced content. If they are going to merge then let there be at least one accurate record rather than two incaccurate ones.

To add a second listing at the same location takes some serious planning to implement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim</p>
<p>I would (at least temorarily) change the primary details of the second listing to the same primary details as the main listing and remove all enhanced content. If they are going to merge then let there be at least one accurate record rather than two incaccurate ones.</p>
<p>To add a second listing at the same location takes some serious planning to implement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
