<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: Claimed Business Records No Longer Can be Hijacked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/02/13/google-claimed-business-records-no-longer-can-be-hijacked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/02/13/google-claimed-business-records-no-longer-can-be-hijacked/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uwe</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/02/13/google-claimed-business-records-no-longer-can-be-hijacked/comment-page-1/#comment-472036</link>
		<dc:creator>Uwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2410#comment-472036</guid>
		<description>Mike, so you see a correlation between the phone verification not offered and the blackout then?

I just had the same experience this week. This time the phone verification was offered but the receptionist on the phone receiving the verification call hung up twice, so I had to wait for my client to return to the business and receive the call (Google doesn&#039;t even identify itself during the call, how nice!) . During that time the business vanished from Google Maps and reappeared once the pin had been entered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, so you see a correlation between the phone verification not offered and the blackout then?</p>
<p>I just had the same experience this week. This time the phone verification was offered but the receptionist on the phone receiving the verification call hung up twice, so I had to wait for my client to return to the business and receive the call (Google doesn&#8217;t even identify itself during the call, how nice!) . During that time the business vanished from Google Maps and reappeared once the pin had been entered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/02/13/google-claimed-business-records-no-longer-can-be-hijacked/comment-page-1/#comment-472005</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2410#comment-472005</guid>
		<description>@Uwe

The reason that the phone number wasn&#039;t offered was that Google did not have confidence it. Their first and least expensive choice is phone verification but after the locksmith scandals they stopped trusting every phone number in the world....

I have not yet experienced the &quot;blackout&quot; but it is conceivable to me that a listing that is initially allowed into the index with &quot;caveats&quot; under some cloud of suspicion might move from one index to another or one status to another and not show up during that change process.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Uwe</p>
<p>The reason that the phone number wasn&#8217;t offered was that Google did not have confidence it. Their first and least expensive choice is phone verification but after the locksmith scandals they stopped trusting every phone number in the world&#8230;.</p>
<p>I have not yet experienced the &#8220;blackout&#8221; but it is conceivable to me that a listing that is initially allowed into the index with &#8220;caveats&#8221; under some cloud of suspicion might move from one index to another or one status to another and not show up during that change process.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uwe</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/02/13/google-claimed-business-records-no-longer-can-be-hijacked/comment-page-1/#comment-471875</link>
		<dc:creator>Uwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2410#comment-471875</guid>
		<description>Here is another behavior I observed by accident.
Claiming an unclaimed listing triggered a verification process using the postcard approach (phone number wasn&#039;t offered for unknown reasons).
The post card didn&#039;t arrive for at least 4 weeks.

After about a week the claimed business vanished from google maps altogether and appeared again after the pin code has been entered in the GLBC.

Is this standard behavior? I hope not, since it would open the doors to any competitor to take businesses off the map.

If this is not standard behavior, do you have an explanation?

Thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another behavior I observed by accident.<br />
Claiming an unclaimed listing triggered a verification process using the postcard approach (phone number wasn&#8217;t offered for unknown reasons).<br />
The post card didn&#8217;t arrive for at least 4 weeks.</p>
<p>After about a week the claimed business vanished from google maps altogether and appeared again after the pin code has been entered in the GLBC.</p>
<p>Is this standard behavior? I hope not, since it would open the doors to any competitor to take businesses off the map.</p>
<p>If this is not standard behavior, do you have an explanation?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe Miou</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/02/13/google-claimed-business-records-no-longer-can-be-hijacked/comment-page-1/#comment-471870</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe Miou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2410#comment-471870</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike.
I wanted to ask you if you could analyse my local business listing and give me your opinion because i used to dominate the search for a few key phrases and now i can only get listed in some of the poor searches.
thanks a bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike.<br />
I wanted to ask you if you could analyse my local business listing and give me your opinion because i used to dominate the search for a few key phrases and now i can only get listed in some of the poor searches.<br />
thanks a bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MOE MIOU</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/02/13/google-claimed-business-records-no-longer-can-be-hijacked/comment-page-1/#comment-465838</link>
		<dc:creator>MOE MIOU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2410#comment-465838</guid>
		<description>I dominated the google business listing for certain keywords and now my clients can hardly find me.
I made all the necessary changes and abided by the gbl guidelines.
No results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dominated the google business listing for certain keywords and now my clients can hardly find me.<br />
I made all the necessary changes and abided by the gbl guidelines.<br />
No results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hector</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/02/13/google-claimed-business-records-no-longer-can-be-hijacked/comment-page-1/#comment-456820</link>
		<dc:creator>Hector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2410#comment-456820</guid>
		<description>What is going on with the Locals now it is not much better at all. real business like mine ads have just diapered then the business at position 1. there web page is down, number dosn&#039;t work, and Id bet that they are using a fake address. and a real business with a real address is gone for good does google even care if its like there adwords and click fraud they don&#039;t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is going on with the Locals now it is not much better at all. real business like mine ads have just diapered then the business at position 1. there web page is down, number dosn&#8217;t work, and Id bet that they are using a fake address. and a real business with a real address is gone for good does google even care if its like there adwords and click fraud they don&#8217;t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/02/13/google-claimed-business-records-no-longer-can-be-hijacked/comment-page-1/#comment-434083</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 13:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2410#comment-434083</guid>
		<description>@Nigel

You might want to read &lt;a href=&quot;http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/10/14/google-maps-six-reasons-why-your-listing-might-go-south-some-tips-to-cope/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Six reasons why your listing might “go South” &amp; some tips to cope&lt;/a&gt; if you haven&#039;t already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nigel</p>
<p>You might want to read <a href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/10/14/google-maps-six-reasons-why-your-listing-might-go-south-some-tips-to-cope/">Six reasons why your listing might “go South” &#038; some tips to cope</a> if you haven&#8217;t already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Palmer</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/02/13/google-claimed-business-records-no-longer-can-be-hijacked/comment-page-1/#comment-432584</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2410#comment-432584</guid>
		<description>Well it seems here in the UK we just have a corrupted LBC and maps database. When I checked today I was suprised to find that we had moved! Name, telephone, hours and position on the map is correct but the address and post (zip) code is for a bussiness in a different industry 25 miles away. I would have thought that the system would have some sort of automatic check which prevented an address being entered for a business location that was more than 50 metres from its shown location on google maps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it seems here in the UK we just have a corrupted LBC and maps database. When I checked today I was suprised to find that we had moved! Name, telephone, hours and position on the map is correct but the address and post (zip) code is for a bussiness in a different industry 25 miles away. I would have thought that the system would have some sort of automatic check which prevented an address being entered for a business location that was more than 50 metres from its shown location on google maps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/02/13/google-claimed-business-records-no-longer-can-be-hijacked/comment-page-1/#comment-420540</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2410#comment-420540</guid>
		<description>@Chuck

I would love to hear more about your story...either here or offline (mike@blumenthals.com)...is it still hijacked? any idea technique? Was Google helpful in squaring away?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chuck</p>
<p>I would love to hear more about your story&#8230;either here or offline (mike@blumenthals.com)&#8230;is it still hijacked? any idea technique? Was Google helpful in squaring away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/02/13/google-claimed-business-records-no-longer-can-be-hijacked/comment-page-1/#comment-420407</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=2410#comment-420407</guid>
		<description>Google did not fix the hijacking problem,do not  let anyone fool you.
I am a locksmith is South Florida,and I have had a few of my local listings hijacked and phone numbers changed and website address changed.
Spamming and hijacking here is a big problem.
I wish they would do aeay with the Local Business Center,I would be better off.

Dates of offences were in May and June of 2009 so it is still happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google did not fix the hijacking problem,do not  let anyone fool you.<br />
I am a locksmith is South Florida,and I have had a few of my local listings hijacked and phone numbers changed and website address changed.<br />
Spamming and hijacking here is a big problem.<br />
I wish they would do aeay with the Local Business Center,I would be better off.</p>
<p>Dates of offences were in May and June of 2009 so it is still happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 507/507 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blumenthals.com @ 2012-05-23 19:44:02 -->
