<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local Links of Interest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/11/28/local-links-of-interest-68/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/11/28/local-links-of-interest-68/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:15:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: panzermike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/11/28/local-links-of-interest-68/comment-page-1/#comment-289475</link>
		<dc:creator>panzermike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=1654#comment-289475</guid>
		<description>FYI.  Google and Yelp are also potential defendants for republishing libel.  I have been warning about this.  Google has lots of money to fight lawsuits, but its bad press to let people republish potential lies and revenge.

That is why I have been advocating an opt out feature so businesses can protect themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI.  Google and Yelp are also potential defendants for republishing libel.  I have been warning about this.  Google has lots of money to fight lawsuits, but its bad press to let people republish potential lies and revenge.</p>
<p>That is why I have been advocating an opt out feature so businesses can protect themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/11/28/local-links-of-interest-68/comment-page-1/#comment-289036</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=1654#comment-289036</guid>
		<description>Good question. I assume that it is just an attempt to push out more ads as there is no sharing mechanism.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. I assume that it is just an attempt to push out more ads as there is no sharing mechanism.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The WebSite Program</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/11/28/local-links-of-interest-68/comment-page-1/#comment-289030</link>
		<dc:creator>The WebSite Program</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=1654#comment-289030</guid>
		<description>So who gets the revenue from the embedded ads?

Do google share the usual (secret) percent or is it not only an attempt to push more ads but also more share of the winnings?

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
embedded Google Maps on your website could very well now include Adword ads to 
your competitor’s website
&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;

[ All My Comments at http://blodcast.com/download-blog ]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who gets the revenue from the embedded ads?</p>
<p>Do google share the usual (secret) percent or is it not only an attempt to push more ads but also more share of the winnings?</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
embedded Google Maps on your website could very well now include Adword ads to<br />
your competitor’s website<br />
&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>[ All My Comments at <a href="http://blodcast.com/download-blog" rel="nofollow">http://blodcast.com/download-blog</a> ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
