<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local Seo Tracking Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/05/08/local-seo-tracking-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/05/08/local-seo-tracking-software/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:22:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/05/08/local-seo-tracking-software/comment-page-1/#comment-590870</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 23:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=649#comment-590870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AWR is great for tracking Google Places and they have nicely implemented a feature where you can track organic rankings without google places which is good where you want to see the results without the blended 7 or 3 pack. But...I have a tricky question does anyone know of any software that will track Google Places listings that are not associated with a website? AWR requires a website but many local listings don&#039;t have websites yet (I know that they should but some don&#039;t)...any ideas?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWR is great for tracking Google Places and they have nicely implemented a feature where you can track organic rankings without google places which is good where you want to see the results without the blended 7 or 3 pack. But&#8230;I have a tricky question does anyone know of any software that will track Google Places listings that are not associated with a website? AWR requires a website but many local listings don&#8217;t have websites yet (I know that they should but some don&#8217;t)&#8230;any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Espinosa</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/05/08/local-seo-tracking-software/comment-page-1/#comment-233467</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Espinosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=649#comment-233467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is awesome that someone finally made someone, we got so tired of checking rankings manually we just made our own application.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is awesome that someone finally made someone, we got so tired of checking rankings manually we just made our own application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/05/08/local-seo-tracking-software/comment-page-1/#comment-233330</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=649#comment-233330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its a full blown tracking tool for an unlimited number of sites, engines and keywords...here is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.advancedwebranking.com/feats-list.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;feature set&lt;/a&gt;.

Mike]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a full blown tracking tool for an unlimited number of sites, engines and keywords&#8230;here is a <a href="http://www.advancedwebranking.com/feats-list.html">feature set</a>.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/05/08/local-seo-tracking-software/comment-page-1/#comment-233305</link>
		<dc:creator>earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=649#comment-233305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is a nice feature.  What else does it do?  

If I have to track lots and lots of sites, it has merit at a cost.  If its only a couple of sites, one can track that manually.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a nice feature.  What else does it do?  </p>
<p>If I have to track lots and lots of sites, it has merit at a cost.  If its only a couple of sites, one can track that manually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
