Ok so we’ve agreed that the free thing is no excuse for Google to do a poor job of communication. That brings us back to the question of why doesn’t google do a better job of getting the “automated touch” as it were?

Your point about their culture and origins is very to point, and they have apparently applied a lot of their programming talent to the algo as opposed to the process. They are lead by programmers not marketers that is for sure.

Sometimes this appears as hubris (like when they assigned competitors URLs to the wrong local listings: here and here ) but as you point out I think it just blindess to the issues.

Mike

I’m still thinking about how amazing it is that Yahoo had to go to so little effort to make you feel ‘taken care of’, that you’d had communication with them. I feel like that about Barnes & Nobles. Their confirmation emails saying the package is in their warehouse, now it’s been shipped, now it’s heading my way…I really love that. I know it is all automated, but it does act as a voice of consideration coming out of the void that is the Internet.

Interesting subject!
Miriam

All that has happened here is that Google has shifted costs. The data aggregation is done by someone else, the reviews are gathered at the review sites are scraped, the data maintanence is done by the small business person or their proxy. If there is a problem with the data who pays the price (ala the Duke or the Pittsburgh Tech school)?

Google has developed a great algo and uses it to effectively present information. But even there who pays the price when they make a judgement call that affects the particpants (ala Denver Florist)?

Google profits from the data and their ordering of it and has a responsiblity to handle the stake holders with integrity. Just because you haven’t paid for the privelege of being listed doesn’t mean that there aren’t costs both direct and indirect to you or your clients.

While local is about people, in our society it is also about profit. Google has developed a cost effective way to deliver customers to the smb’s and they have profited by having automated that task. They may not being able to dominate all aspects of local with this model but in the end if it is more cost efficient & has shifted more costs and ends up more profitable, they will dominate as capital flows to them and away from higher cost models.

But as you note Google seems blind to the human side of the equation and one really hopes that they figure out how to do better than that. One also hopes that they can get their darn software to work better (sheesh this is starting to sound like another company I know).

Mike

Your 4 points of comparison are completely on-target. Google should really listen to what you are saying about this, Mike.

Why is Google not ‘getting it’ in this area? Here’s a theory…their original business model was geared toward delivering massive data to the masses. The relationship was an impersonal one. No handshakes or kissing babies needed. Just roll out the SERPs and the faceless end user is happy.

That’s not how things work on a local level. Local is all about personal dealings with neighbors. Google is not getting the neighbor part. They are not even getting the aura of ‘your neighborly robot’ that Yahoo is clearly striving for with the efforts you’ve outlined, above.

I know, a few months ago, there was coverage of Google’s effort to hire people to collect local data on foot, but I have no idea what happened with that. Do you?

Here’s the trouble, though. YPs and other local-type advertising ventures invest tremendous sums of money into putting those reps on the street to make contact with local businesses, and they charge vast sums for the ads in their books. Maps is free. It makes me feel weak on cause for complaints about any problems, because it’s free.

But I’m looking at Googles new SERPs with their big new 10 box and am saying, “serious money needs to be put into this if it’s being given top billing by Google. Brainpower and funding need to go into making this the best local directory there is.”

Well, I’m rambling on, but I have a lot of thoughts about this. And, I have been thinking about a blog post, funnily enough. I need a 27 hour day.

Miriam

You are so right. (In fact I think there is a blog post in your response :)).

Just compare the two responses at the end of the listing/correction process between Google and Yahoo:

1)-Google says “awaiting next update”- 6-8 weeks
-Yahoo says you will here from us shortly

2)-Google goes silent
-Yahoo sends and email that confirms the posting

3)-Google expects that you already know how to determine if your listing is there & live (which most smb’s don’t)
-Yahoo sends you a link to actually confirm it

4)-Google makes you go to Groups and forces the SMB to ask questions and suggest alternatives
- Yahoo proactively says tell us what you think, we want your feedback

Which points out how simple and valuable good communication is in the process even if the quality of human interaction isn’t there.

How easily Google could do exactly the same thing. When the record actually goes live just send out a confirming email. It would eliminate a large number of posts to the Group and save Maps Guide Jen time to answer real questions. Just the saving in human time would make the proactive approach worth it to say nothing nothing about repuation management. The amount of ill will avoided would be significant.

Maybe Google needs to hire you and me as SMB ombudspeople! They could use the help. Amazing how for a smart company they can act so stupid sometimes. Why do you think that is so?

Mike

What is it that we tell small business owners they must do in order to succeed? Treat their customers well. In the local scene, this will be heavily reflected in the number and tone of the reviews they receive.

Google needs to take a page from this book.

Over the past months, avidly reading your on-going documentation of problems in maps, and seeing bugs and problems of my own, the undertone to it all is that there are disconnects happening at 3 apparent levels:

1) Business owners aren’t aware of Google local and are therefor not controlling their own listings

2) Even when business owners are aware of their local listing and are attempting to keep it updated, these changes can take weeks or months to be reflected in the on-page results.

3) When problems happen, it seems next to impossible to communicate with Google.

Overall, there is a lack of communication between Google and their very important local business owners. If Google truly wants to rule the world as far as local business data is concerned, these disconnects need to be remedied to cut down margins for error and improve relations. When I think of the trouble that traditional YP firms go to in order to meet with and take care of the clients in their book, Google is looking pretty remote.

Great post.
Miriam