Comments on: Google Maps experimenting with Local OneBox http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/18/google-maps-experimenting-with-local-onebox/ Developing Knowledge about Local Search Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:41:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Understanding Google Maps & Yahoo Local Search » Google Maps Expanded Local OneBox Makes Brief Reappearance | Developing Knowledge about Local Search http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/18/google-maps-experimenting-with-local-onebox/#comment-190834 Understanding Google Maps & Yahoo Local Search » Google Maps Expanded Local OneBox Makes Brief Reappearance | Developing Knowledge about Local Search Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:58:09 +0000 http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/18/google-maps-experimenting-with-local-onebox/#comment-190834 [...] speculated in my last post that it was taking up something less than 1/3 more room. It actually is only occupying 10% more [...] [...] speculated in my last post that it was taking up something less than 1/3 more room. It actually is only occupying 10% more [...]

]]> By: Mike Blumenthal http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/18/google-maps-experimenting-with-local-onebox/#comment-190012 Mike Blumenthal Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:51:06 +0000 http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/18/google-maps-experimenting-with-local-onebox/#comment-190012 Hi Paul Thanks for looking. I guess time will tell. On the reviews issue it is also of interest that when there were no reviews it provides a "more" button instead. There is no address and the pin is also smaller. Mike Hi Paul

Thanks for looking. I guess time will tell.

On the reviews issue it is also of interest that when there were no reviews it provides a “more” button instead. There is no address and the pin is also smaller.

Mike

]]> By: Paul Jahn http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/18/google-maps-experimenting-with-local-onebox/#comment-190005 Paul Jahn Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:30:27 +0000 http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/18/google-maps-experimenting-with-local-onebox/#comment-190005 Good question. Looking at Greg's Screenwerk comparison, it looks like the font is the same. There just aren't any spaces between the listings. The font didn't change when narrowing the screen. I wish I could compare the two, but only the "ten" results are shown still in tundra-land. I really like your "review over directions" reference - something that didn't dawn on me at all. Good question. Looking at Greg’s Screenwerk comparison, it looks like the font is the same. There just aren’t any spaces between the listings. The font didn’t change when narrowing the screen.

I wish I could compare the two, but only the “ten” results are shown still in tundra-land.

I really like your “review over directions” reference - something that didn’t dawn on me at all.

]]> By: Mike Blumenthal http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/18/google-maps-experimenting-with-local-onebox/#comment-189881 Mike Blumenthal Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:28:00 +0000 http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/18/google-maps-experimenting-with-local-onebox/#comment-189881 Hi Paul So you are saying it is almost a third less again...how did it compare to the Map Image Size when viewed full width? Was the font smaller? Mike Hi Paul

So you are saying it is almost a third less again…how did it compare to the Map Image Size when viewed full width? Was the font smaller?

Mike

]]> By: Paul Jahn http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/18/google-maps-experimenting-with-local-onebox/#comment-189852 Paul Jahn Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:52:17 +0000 http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/18/google-maps-experimenting-with-local-onebox/#comment-189852 Hey, thanks for the mention Mike and great post! The space allocated is probably even less. To meet image specs at SEG, I narrowed the window to under half the screen width before I took a screenshot. In a full size window, A-J is almost always just a single line. :) Hey, thanks for the mention Mike and great post!

The space allocated is probably even less. To meet image specs at SEG, I narrowed the window to under half the screen width before I took a screenshot. In a full size window, A-J is almost always just a single line. :)

]]>