<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google acknowledges Adword experiment with Local Address</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 10:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Local Address in PPC Ads &#124; DailyPPCTips.com</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/comment-page-1/#comment-217124</link>
		<dc:creator>Local Address in PPC Ads &#124; DailyPPCTips.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/#comment-217124</guid>
		<description>[...] on Blumenthal,Â  SEORoundTable, Screenwork and Vertical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Blumenthal,Â  SEORoundTable, Screenwork and Vertical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Letting Addresses into AdWords? &#171; Screenwerk</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/comment-page-1/#comment-189021</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Letting Addresses into AdWords? &#171; Screenwerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/#comment-189021</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Blumenthal got confirmation that this was a Google-originated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Blumenthal got confirmation that this was a Google-originated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/comment-page-1/#comment-187390</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/#comment-187390</guid>
		<description>I think that it is based on associating the ad with a business in the local business center via the Google Choice in adwords. It clearly isn&#039;t associated with limited businesses that are in the test...but the display of the address could be a test...or it could be here for keeps. It has been visible since early December.

It is an interesting way for Google to highlight an ad that has relevant local content vs a national that is just serving the market without bricks and mortar.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it is based on associating the ad with a business in the local business center via the Google Choice in adwords. It clearly isn&#8217;t associated with limited businesses that are in the test&#8230;but the display of the address could be a test&#8230;or it could be here for keeps. It has been visible since early December.</p>
<p>It is an interesting way for Google to highlight an ad that has relevant local content vs a national that is just serving the market without bricks and mortar.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/comment-page-1/#comment-187384</link>
		<dc:creator>earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/#comment-187384</guid>
		<description>In fact I searched a variety of phrases and found one example where there a large number of ads with the top one having a plusbox and then one the ads on the side with an address on the fourth line.

I&#039;m wondering if the ads showing up with either the plusbox or address information entered there data in the google local business center.  I&#039;ll check up on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact I searched a variety of phrases and found one example where there a large number of ads with the top one having a plusbox and then one the ads on the side with an address on the fourth line.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering if the ads showing up with either the plusbox or address information entered there data in the google local business center.  I&#8217;ll check up on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/comment-page-1/#comment-187347</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/#comment-187347</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave

I poked around majr markets on major search terms and the address is frequently there. Given what you said it definitely is not &quot;account based&quot; experiment as the email seemed to indicate.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave</p>
<p>I poked around majr markets on major search terms and the address is frequently there. Given what you said it definitely is not &#8220;account based&#8221; experiment as the email seemed to indicate.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/comment-page-1/#comment-187340</link>
		<dc:creator>earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/#comment-187340</guid>
		<description>We have received both.  When the ad is the top ad and above the natural serps we have received the plus box.

At other times if the ad is placed on the right hand side and under some other ads, it has simply had an address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have received both.  When the ad is the top ad and above the natural serps we have received the plus box.</p>
<p>At other times if the ad is placed on the right hand side and under some other ads, it has simply had an address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/comment-page-1/#comment-186815</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/#comment-186815</guid>
		<description>Dave
Are you getting the 4th line on the add or the Plus Box?

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave<br />
Are you getting the 4th line on the add or the Plus Box?</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/comment-page-1/#comment-186778</link>
		<dc:creator>earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/#comment-186778</guid>
		<description>Just to be a bit more specific.  I have a business that has been a recipient of the address line in the advertising.  They never contacted us.  So if they aren&#039;t adding businesses, one should know that they didn&#039;t contact businesses either.  

Whatever the criterion are for choosing advertisers, its beyond me.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be a bit more specific.  I have a business that has been a recipient of the address line in the advertising.  They never contacted us.  So if they aren&#8217;t adding businesses, one should know that they didn&#8217;t contact businesses either.  </p>
<p>Whatever the criterion are for choosing advertisers, its beyond me.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Google Allows Local Addresses On PPC Ads Pay Per Click Journal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/comment-page-1/#comment-186078</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Google Allows Local Addresses On PPC Ads Pay Per Click Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/01/11/google-acknowleges-adword-experiment-with-local-address/#comment-186078</guid>
		<description>[...] of local addresses in their pay per click ads. So far, Screenwerk, SERoundtable, Vertical Leap, and Blumenthals have all reported on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of local addresses in their pay per click ads. So far, Screenwerk, SERoundtable, Vertical Leap, and Blumenthals have all reported on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 489/490 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blumenthals.com @ 2012-05-22 07:12:56 -->
