<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local Links of Interest:Google&#8217;s Universal Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/05/17/local-links-of-interestgoogles-universal-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/05/17/local-links-of-interestgoogles-universal-search/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:37:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/05/17/local-links-of-interestgoogles-universal-search/comment-page-1/#comment-25586</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/05/17/local-links-of-interestgoogles-universal-search/#comment-25586</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes they do seem to be in experimental mode (I am sure that you saw  &lt;a href=&quot;href=&quot;http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/05/17/google-city-search-returns-different-map-styles/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my city maps example&lt;/a&gt; which appears to be a very visible experiment in user preferences)...but I am more concerned about the &lt;a href=&quot;href=&quot;http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/05/17/173/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;unfinished nature&lt;/a&gt; of the Maps text view. It implies a certain lack of fit and finish to the whole affair. Google has 10,000 products in beta why do they need a finished one that isn&#039;t working quite right?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike
&lt;/p&gt;




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes they do seem to be in experimental mode (I am sure that you saw  <a href="href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/05/17/google-city-search-returns-different-map-styles/">my city maps example</a> which appears to be a very visible experiment in user preferences)&#8230;but I am more concerned about the <a href="href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/05/17/173/">unfinished nature</a> of the Maps text view. It implies a certain lack of fit and finish to the whole affair. Google has 10,000 products in beta why do they need a finished one that isn&#8217;t working quite right?</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/05/17/local-links-of-interestgoogles-universal-search/comment-page-1/#comment-25568</link>
		<dc:creator>Earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 23:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/05/17/local-links-of-interestgoogles-universal-search/#comment-25568</guid>
		<description>Mike:

Nice overview and references.  Approximately 3 days after the change was installed I&#039;m watching only one category and a variety of search queries and the status vis a vis the onebox and g maps is changing daily.  On one day a specific query will see a onebox and on another day it won&#039;t.  For the same query on different days I see the onebox on the top of the page and the next day the onebox is below 3 or 4 sites.

Google is massively testing user behavior across the board.

As a webmaster/site owner/ business person....my site which generally sits at a #1 organic rank for a wide variety of relevant phrases that combine geo and business terms is seeing dramatically different placement vis a vis the rotating/changing status of the onebox.

Ha....I&#039;m already putting more money into ppc.  Oh well...gotta ride this thing out.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:</p>
<p>Nice overview and references.  Approximately 3 days after the change was installed I&#8217;m watching only one category and a variety of search queries and the status vis a vis the onebox and g maps is changing daily.  On one day a specific query will see a onebox and on another day it won&#8217;t.  For the same query on different days I see the onebox on the top of the page and the next day the onebox is below 3 or 4 sites.</p>
<p>Google is massively testing user behavior across the board.</p>
<p>As a webmaster/site owner/ business person&#8230;.my site which generally sits at a #1 organic rank for a wide variety of relevant phrases that combine geo and business terms is seeing dramatically different placement vis a vis the rotating/changing status of the onebox.</p>
<p>Ha&#8230;.I&#8217;m already putting more money into ppc.  Oh well&#8230;gotta ride this thing out.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 367/368 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blumenthals.com @ 2012-02-09 07:54:04 -->
