<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Maps Custom Attributes differ by industry segment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/03/09/google-maps-custom-attributes-differ-by-industry-segment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/03/09/google-maps-custom-attributes-differ-by-industry-segment/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:21:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/03/09/google-maps-custom-attributes-differ-by-industry-segment/comment-page-1/#comment-7142</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=130#comment-7142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Google has been collecting this level of data from those uploading for a while then?

Mike]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Google has been collecting this level of data from those uploading for a while then?</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acuth</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/03/09/google-maps-custom-attributes-differ-by-industry-segment/comment-page-1/#comment-7141</link>
		<dc:creator>acuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=130#comment-7141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judging by the common attributes mentioned in relationship with restaurants (http://www.google.com/base/help/custom_fields.html) and the filters offered when searching restaurants (http://base.google.com/base/s2?btnG=Search+Base&amp;q=restaurants&amp;a_n0=restaurants&amp;a_y0=9&amp;nd=1&amp;showrefine=1) I suspect the answer is yes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by the common attributes mentioned in relationship with restaurants (<a href="http://www.google.com/base/help/custom_fields.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/base/help/custom_fields.html</a>) and the filters offered when searching restaurants (<a href="http://base.google.com/base/s2?btnG=Search+Base&#038;q=restaurants&#038;a_n0=restaurants&#038;a_y0=9&#038;nd=1&#038;showrefine=1" rel="nofollow">http://base.google.com/base/s2?btnG=Search+Base&#038;q=restaurants&#038;a_n0=restaurants&#038;a_y0=9&#038;nd=1&#038;showrefine=1</a>) I suspect the answer is yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/03/09/google-maps-custom-attributes-differ-by-industry-segment/comment-page-1/#comment-7122</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=130#comment-7122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good question. I don&#039;t really know. Perhaps someone could chime in here?

Mike]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. I don&#8217;t really know. Perhaps someone could chime in here?</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acuth</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/03/09/google-maps-custom-attributes-differ-by-industry-segment/comment-page-1/#comment-7121</link>
		<dc:creator>acuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=130#comment-7121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this the same schema they have been promoting in Google Base? If I remember correctly they recently decided to discourage the use of simple tags in favour of these name:value pairs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the same schema they have been promoting in Google Base? If I remember correctly they recently decided to discourage the use of simple tags in favour of these name:value pairs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
