<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google allows corrections to unverified Map entries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/02/13/google-allows-corrections-to-unverified-map-entires/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/02/13/google-allows-corrections-to-unverified-map-entires/</link>
	<description>Developing Knowledge about Local Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/02/13/google-allows-corrections-to-unverified-map-entires/comment-page-1/#comment-478133</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=104#comment-478133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@MAry
Obviously Google is not aware of Harvest Drive. It is necessary to &quot;report a problem&quot; (using the on Map link) detailing the information that they are missing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MAry<br />
Obviously Google is not aware of Harvest Drive. It is necessary to &#8220;report a problem&#8221; (using the on Map link) detailing the information that they are missing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/02/13/google-allows-corrections-to-unverified-map-entires/comment-page-1/#comment-478124</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=104#comment-478124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have tried repeatedly to access driving directions from Google, type in my starting address, which is Harvest DRIVE North Andover MA 01845 &amp; keep coming with directions from Harvest Lane. I live in a condo off Route 114 in North Andover, on the No. Andover/Middleton MA line.  Please try to correct this mistake, &amp; Email me if this is possible.

Thank you,Mary]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried repeatedly to access driving directions from Google, type in my starting address, which is Harvest DRIVE North Andover MA 01845 &amp; keep coming with directions from Harvest Lane. I live in a condo off Route 114 in North Andover, on the No. Andover/Middleton MA line.  Please try to correct this mistake, &amp; Email me if this is possible.</p>
<p>Thank you,Mary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/02/13/google-allows-corrections-to-unverified-map-entires/comment-page-1/#comment-256738</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=104#comment-256738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter 

This type of error is caused by the underlying map data that Google gets from Teleatlas and Navteq. This type of problem needs to be reported to them.

Google provides the &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=98014&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;contact info and instructions&lt;/a&gt; in their Maps Help area.

Mike]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter </p>
<p>This type of error is caused by the underlying map data that Google gets from Teleatlas and Navteq. This type of problem needs to be reported to them.</p>
<p>Google provides the <a href="http://maps.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=98014">contact info and instructions</a> in their Maps Help area.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/02/13/google-allows-corrections-to-unverified-map-entires/comment-page-1/#comment-256636</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=104#comment-256636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was looking at a map of the Queen charlotte Islands Canada, where I grew up, and noticed Google has a bunch of ferries going to a tidal mud flat where we used tio dig clams! The ferry landing is actually about eight miles northeast near Skidegate. Because this is not a business but part of the Highway, it cannot be reported!

Wrong spot:  
http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;q=53.968709,-132.623777&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;s=&amp;ll=53.239588,-132.161579&amp;spn=0.024553,0.086174&amp;t=h&amp;z=14


If you look to the top right of this map, you&#039;ll see the ferry berths!

(and the incorrect ferry route passing well below)

http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;q=53.968709,-132.623777&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;s=&amp;t=h&amp;ll=53.241566,-132.006011&amp;spn=0.012661,0.022573&amp;z=15&amp;iwloc=addr


Incredible error, since the other road is an active logging road, that also leads to some of the worlds best fishing grounds. And perhaps an encounter with a 14&#039; wide truck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking at a map of the Queen charlotte Islands Canada, where I grew up, and noticed Google has a bunch of ferries going to a tidal mud flat where we used tio dig clams! The ferry landing is actually about eight miles northeast near Skidegate. Because this is not a business but part of the Highway, it cannot be reported!</p>
<p>Wrong spot:<br />
<a href="http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&#038;hl=en&#038;q=53.968709,-132.623777&#038;ie=UTF8&#038;s=&#038;ll=53.239588,-132.161579&#038;spn=0.024553,0.086174&#038;t=h&#038;z=14" rel="nofollow">http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&#038;hl=en&#038;q=53.968709,-132.623777&#038;ie=UTF8&#038;s=&#038;ll=53.239588,-132.161579&#038;spn=0.024553,0.086174&#038;t=h&#038;z=14</a></p>
<p>If you look to the top right of this map, you&#8217;ll see the ferry berths!</p>
<p>(and the incorrect ferry route passing well below)</p>
<p><a href="http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&#038;hl=en&#038;q=53.968709,-132.623777&#038;ie=UTF8&#038;s=&#038;t=h&#038;ll=53.241566,-132.006011&#038;spn=0.012661,0.022573&#038;z=15&#038;iwloc=addr" rel="nofollow">http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&#038;hl=en&#038;q=53.968709,-132.623777&#038;ie=UTF8&#038;s=&#038;t=h&#038;ll=53.241566,-132.006011&#038;spn=0.012661,0.022573&#038;z=15&#038;iwloc=addr</a></p>
<p>Incredible error, since the other road is an active logging road, that also leads to some of the worlds best fishing grounds. And perhaps an encounter with a 14&#8242; wide truck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/02/13/google-allows-corrections-to-unverified-map-entires/comment-page-1/#comment-211414</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=104#comment-211414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi winnie

Your listing IS in Maps. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=Williams%20Divorce%20and%20Family%20Law%20woodbury%20mn&amp;sourceid=mozilla-search&amp;start=0&amp;start=0&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this search&lt;/a&gt; on your trade name + city.

You are not showing up under divorce lawyer because of the strength of the other listings. You can optimize your listing to do better and show up in more appropriate spots. See my article on title tags and  ranking.

This article is about a very esoteric condition in which Google admits that a certain record, possibly a duplicate, has a degree of uncertainty and they are asking for use input. It doesn&#039;t show up very frequently.

Mike

PS normally I don&#039;t respond to posts this old because of spammers. You are welcome to post to newer entries or email me]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi winnie</p>
<p>Your listing IS in Maps. See <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=Williams%20Divorce%20and%20Family%20Law%20woodbury%20mn&#038;sourceid=mozilla-search&#038;start=0&#038;start=0&#038;ie=utf-8&#038;oe=utf-8">this search</a> on your trade name + city.</p>
<p>You are not showing up under divorce lawyer because of the strength of the other listings. You can optimize your listing to do better and show up in more appropriate spots. See my article on title tags and  ranking.</p>
<p>This article is about a very esoteric condition in which Google admits that a certain record, possibly a duplicate, has a degree of uncertainty and they are asking for use input. It doesn&#8217;t show up very frequently.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
<p>PS normally I don&#8217;t respond to posts this old because of spammers. You are welcome to post to newer entries or email me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winnie Williams</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/02/13/google-allows-corrections-to-unverified-map-entires/comment-page-1/#comment-211332</link>
		<dc:creator>Winnie Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=104#comment-211332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was pleased to see them add unverified listings, because it seems to be the only way I can get our business listed.  I verified our business&#039;s listing in early January, and it shows up that way within my google account.  I know it is supposed to take about 6 weeks, but we are well past that and still not showing up.  I&#039;m wondering if I have fallen victim to a glitch in the system, and I don&#039;t know how to find out.  We were actually sent two different verification codes in the mail.  I used one, and we showed up verified.  I&#039;m wondering if there is an issue because we were sent two different verification codes.  I&#039;d like to understand why we aren&#039;t showing up, particularly because we are the only business in our zip code practicing exclusively our area of law, and have it in the name of our business.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was pleased to see them add unverified listings, because it seems to be the only way I can get our business listed.  I verified our business&#8217;s listing in early January, and it shows up that way within my google account.  I know it is supposed to take about 6 weeks, but we are well past that and still not showing up.  I&#8217;m wondering if I have fallen victim to a glitch in the system, and I don&#8217;t know how to find out.  We were actually sent two different verification codes in the mail.  I used one, and we showed up verified.  I&#8217;m wondering if there is an issue because we were sent two different verification codes.  I&#8217;d like to understand why we aren&#8217;t showing up, particularly because we are the only business in our zip code practicing exclusively our area of law, and have it in the name of our business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/02/13/google-allows-corrections-to-unverified-map-entires/comment-page-1/#comment-4809</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=104#comment-4809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great points!

I was looking at a listing of local restaurants...google has roughly 60 listed and only 2 very near the end were unverified and several others were either dupes or out of business. I was going to look further and see

Mike]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points!</p>
<p>I was looking at a listing of local restaurants&#8230;google has roughly 60 listed and only 2 very near the end were unverified and several others were either dupes or out of business. I was going to look further and see</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/02/13/google-allows-corrections-to-unverified-map-entires/comment-page-1/#comment-4807</link>
		<dc:creator>Earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=104#comment-4807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike:  While scanning businesses for my location and industry I found one example of an unverfied listing.  The business is not in existance.  So I processed this through the G methodology.

I&#039;m skeptical how they are doing this.  I know that at least five businesses in my category in G maps in my industry and location have not been in business for 7 years or longer with 4 of them having not been in business for 9 years.

How is G identifying these businesses and then highlighting them in  G maps.  How is it identifying one as unverfied data and then 5 others as being verified?  Who verified these listings?  They haven&#039;t been in business for years.  How is it that one business showed up as &quot;unverified&quot; when others don&#039;t.

Having followed local rankings for several years I&#039;d suggest that G maps insertions into organic results is moving Google backwards.

Pre February 2005, Organic Google had very poor logic for searches for local businesses.  They briliantly corrected this in February 2005 and small businesses across the country were being found for logical searches via inclusion of address and/or phone number information within their websites.  These websites supplanted crazy rankings that had amazon, ebay, and other inappropriate sites showing for a query such as .....plumber springfield, missouri.  It was a dramatic and successful improvement in search logic.

Now Google is going backwards by including incorrect and invalid data from a myriad of old sources.  The data is currently largely impervious to cleaning.

With the failure rate for small businesses being rather large Google has to be providing numerous examples of businesses that aren&#039;t operating.  These examples are now supplanting the visibility of existing businesses, some of whom are spending dramatic amounts of money on their websites and current efforts to be seen by the public.

I hope Google moves more rapidly to change this situation.

Dave]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:  While scanning businesses for my location and industry I found one example of an unverfied listing.  The business is not in existance.  So I processed this through the G methodology.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m skeptical how they are doing this.  I know that at least five businesses in my category in G maps in my industry and location have not been in business for 7 years or longer with 4 of them having not been in business for 9 years.</p>
<p>How is G identifying these businesses and then highlighting them in  G maps.  How is it identifying one as unverfied data and then 5 others as being verified?  Who verified these listings?  They haven&#8217;t been in business for years.  How is it that one business showed up as &#8220;unverified&#8221; when others don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Having followed local rankings for several years I&#8217;d suggest that G maps insertions into organic results is moving Google backwards.</p>
<p>Pre February 2005, Organic Google had very poor logic for searches for local businesses.  They briliantly corrected this in February 2005 and small businesses across the country were being found for logical searches via inclusion of address and/or phone number information within their websites.  These websites supplanted crazy rankings that had amazon, ebay, and other inappropriate sites showing for a query such as &#8230;..plumber springfield, missouri.  It was a dramatic and successful improvement in search logic.</p>
<p>Now Google is going backwards by including incorrect and invalid data from a myriad of old sources.  The data is currently largely impervious to cleaning.</p>
<p>With the failure rate for small businesses being rather large Google has to be providing numerous examples of businesses that aren&#8217;t operating.  These examples are now supplanting the visibility of existing businesses, some of whom are spending dramatic amounts of money on their websites and current efforts to be seen by the public.</p>
<p>I hope Google moves more rapidly to change this situation.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Understanding Google Maps &#38; Yahoo Local Search &#187; One small step for Google, a smaller step for Mankind</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/02/13/google-allows-corrections-to-unverified-map-entires/comment-page-1/#comment-4795</link>
		<dc:creator>Understanding Google Maps &#38; Yahoo Local Search &#187; One small step for Google, a smaller step for Mankind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=104#comment-4795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Yesterday I wrote of Google now allowing user correction of unverified business listings in Google Maps. It was reported by Barry Schwartz and repeated elsewhere that I, in part, played a part in this outcome. Well it has been a sort of Charlie Brown moment&#8230;. You know, when Lucy holds out the football every fall and Charlie, in his trusting way, goes to kick it&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday I wrote of Google now allowing user correction of unverified business listings in Google Maps. It was reported by Barry Schwartz and repeated elsewhere that I, in part, played a part in this outcome. Well it has been a sort of Charlie Brown moment&#8230;. You know, when Lucy holds out the football every fall and Charlie, in his trusting way, goes to kick it&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Blumenthal</title>
		<link>http://blumenthals.com/blog/2007/02/13/google-allows-corrections-to-unverified-map-entires/comment-page-1/#comment-4720</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Blumenthal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blumenthals.com/blog/?p=104#comment-4720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earl
It might be that you are not yet seeing the correction url...wait 24 hours and let me know if you still can&#039;t see it

Mike]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earl<br />
It might be that you are not yet seeing the correction url&#8230;wait 24 hours and let me know if you still can&#8217;t see it</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
